Dude, did you read the article? You think he didn’t try to get out of that situation? Being unarmed guaranteed he was at the disadvantage. You’re literally arguing that him dying with no chance to defend himself is the better option here.

I know I’d prefer my father defend himself with me in the car as opposed to him being fucking dead.

Clearly, we need manufacturers to offer more manual transmissions now to reduce the chances of this sort of tragedy. Think about the children.

You can go and buy a smaller gun, and should. Be responsible and don’t be vulnerable!

That serves nearly every human alive, if we’re being honest. Some friends and some family (maybe) may miss them and hurt, but offing these two psychos is actually cheaper and safer than keeping them alive. If they really shot someone over his choice in transmissions, they are irretrievably broken and forever…

That serves nearly every human alive, if we’re being honest. Some friends and some family (maybe) may miss them and hurt, but offing these two psychos is actually cheaper and safer than keeping them alive. If they really shot someone over his choice in transmissions, they are irretrievably broken and forever…

A team that’s not willing to risk losing him will.

This is fucking stupid. People are fucking stupid.

Why won’t you guys just take each of the political-offshoot sub-sites and put them under one umbrella? Then, people who want to read about politics can. Just seeing the constant smattering of this shit in the Deadspin/Gizmodo/Jalopnik feeds makes me sick. I don’t want to read about that shit, or even think about it,…

It’s amazing what the human brain will justify when it fits the internal narrative.

Beef isn’t beef if it’s fucking chicken, now is it?

Of course “you” don’t.

His? :/

You said “safety and concealment” and I read “revenue.”

COTD

Kind of hard to argue a QP is not for personal use when the dude has enough money to buy in those volumes. Distribution and delivery is a bit of a stretch. That said, where’s the next party?

I’m also curious what the plan is for the large majority of colleges that don’t turn a profit. Should the players in those schools, or even just in the not-profitable sports at these original schools have to pay in? Everything being argued here is in the name of fairness, right? Is it fair to the “good” athletes to…

Then perhaps they need better influences in their lives helping guide them to better degrees/career paths. It irritates the shit out of me how so many people suggest these players have no say in their own lives and are being abused and taken advantage of. They have more help already than most average students who…

So, have a minor league and leave college sports to kids who want an education.

What about the 95% of schools that don’t turn a profit with their sports teams?Do those players need to pay in? I mean, if this is all about fairness, the school shouldn’t be on the hook for kids who aren’t any good.