“But the big one: Ted not taking Rebecca’s offer to make him one of the highest paid coaches in the league (and hence, the world). That he didn’t even consider how to make that work because the idea of him going home had plot-armor? Not good enough.”

Oh, and I want to read Roy’s “very brief foreword” to Trent Crimm’s book. I imagine it’s something like “Oi! I used to think Trent was a prick but it turns out he’s all right. READ THIS!”

In the flash forward it seemed like he was back up to being assistant coach. But I appreciated that they didn’t immediately bring Nate back into the coaching team. After who he became as assistant coach at Richmond and manager at West Ham, he needed to go back to his roots and embrace just being Nate again so he could…

They should be laughing at Trump. Why aren’t you?

Hello, I come from the future. Here’s what happened:

“The reality is that this guy (who is independently wealthy) did no actual work..”

There’s such a weird amount of glee here at this news and I don’t get it. I hate what this site has become. 

My man, you have to drive at least 100 miles away from the bay area to even get a glimpse of undiminished stars.

SJ, work in SF.

Everytime this Scott Satellite guy comments, it seems based off false preconceived notions.

Undiminished stars over San Francisco?? I can see you have never been there at night.

No, it was designed to be temporary and then was made permanent and the actual upkeep costs were closer to 12million over the term of the contract. I know all this because I read the article.

I fully agree, but you are not going to get that in the most dense area of San Francisco regardless of this art installation.

Yeah, I love the backdrop of the lit-up Bridge both when walking on Embarcadero or behind the decks of Oracle Park when sitting in the upper deck. My favorite picture of my girlfriend was one I took with her at one of the piers with the lit-up bridge stretching behind her.

It looks good and people like their city to look good. Also good for the already astronomical property values, and good for tourism (which is a huge chunk of revenue for lower market st/fishermans wharf etc) to have another whimsical thing to offer.

uh, this isn’t the Golden Gate, dude. I dont think anyone in SF considers the old half of the Oakland Bay Bridge on the level of the mona lisa, lol.

I have to say, it’s pretty fitting that the person shitting all over this thread is named after a river so polluted that it can no longer sustain life.

You keep making claims about events that didn’t happen, and when people ask you to substantiate your own comments, you suddenly can’t be bothered enough to know what you’re talking about. That’s not cool or edgy. You’re just admitting that you’re clueless. This is embarrassing for you!

Straight up banning books because the governor thinks its obscenity and does it for cynical political gain, vs the estate editing copies of books to change some phrases, doesn’t change the overall books meaning, and wasn’t forced by any politician with the goal probably just being make more money. Clearly these are…

Try rereading, it but be less stupid when you do.