sarcastro3
Sarcastro3
sarcastro3

It’s kinda different if you’ve got up to 20 to 31 million people to back you up. That’s the currently estimated upper limit on the number of Americans who agree with the sentiment: “violence is justified to restore Donald Trump to the Presidency” - up to 8 to 12 percent of ALL Americans. Not 8 to 12 percent of Republic

This was always the issue with the former guy. Anything he said someone else had done, you knew he had done it himself and was trying to project it on his political enemies. And yet... 70+ million Americans are sure he’s telling the truth about a rigged election.

YouTube would be wise to demonitize that video and withhold payment until after the investigation. 

Nice candor from Brian Cox there.

I have kids so I long ago embraced rechargable AA and AAA batteries. I got a couple chargers and just started replacing disposable ones with rechargeable ones.  They don’t hold as long as a charge but when they die you can swap quick, which again is good because I have kids and kids don’t put shit back on to charge. 

Russia groomed Trump for the presidency for years because they knew he was a dumb, petty, arrogant patsy that could be easily manipulated and controlled by stroking his wallet and ego and it worked like a charm.

Huh, didn’t know Russian bots were already on Gizmodo.

Who let their dad onto this comment section?

These corporations aren’t going to just accept these losses

I have no doubt that if Trump had been reelected Ukraine would already be under Soviet control. Because Ukraine didn’t go along with the Trump\Giuliani scam that vindictive motherfucker would not have lifted a finger to save them. At most there would be anemic sanctions. At worst there would have been a total

Yeah man it's totally America massing at the borders and hacking Ukraine state assets. Jesus fucking Christ. 

I do take issue with the idea that we countered America “in the most Australian way possible”, seeing as the truck did not spill out tonnes of beer and flag-encased racists.

It pretty clearly seems to being suggesting the exact opposite of what they claim it does.

No fucking way they drop a court case with a $1.8 billion dollar tag because they think they weren’t in the wrong.  Not a fucking chance.  

He must have been so proudly clapping his own back, thinking what a genius move of throwing an insult on his interviewer, but he only played himself.

Agreed, it’s not possible to expose someone like him with the truth because he has no shame. So what is the benefit to anyone from this sort of interview even taking place?

I don’t know if “simp” is the right word, but no one should be giving Trump airtime. You can’t ask the “tough questions” when you’re dealing with someone who is incapable of telling the truth.

You could 100% see that coming from the moment they used “but” in their original post.

Nothing good ever comes after a “but” when discussing bigotry.

“Gay people deserve respect, BUT...”

You would think that someone would have told Trump that his ‘all the people’ and ‘many people’ and ‘tons of people’ he frequently mentions backing up his bullshit is known to literally everyone as a bat-signal beacon that spells out ‘No one is saying this and I’m am lying’ by now.

Why does a clean criminal history absolve you from a crime?