She can't compete in NCAA if her GPA is below a certain point, I'm pretty sure, and if she can't compete she loses her scholarship.
She can't compete in NCAA if her GPA is below a certain point, I'm pretty sure, and if she can't compete she loses her scholarship.
If all I wanted from the show was joke followed by joke I would watch a one-liner stand up special.
Also let's just acknowledge that Netflix pushes its own produced content at a more frequent/broad rate than it does the rest of its titles. Netflix would much prefer you watch their stuff than the stuff they got the streaming rights to regardless of your personal taste.
If you log in on your browser you can see your complete view history.
I think it must have been an multiple factor formula based on 'this is in a genre you seem to like/dislike', 'other people who rate similarly to you think THIS about this movie' and a general consensus input as well.
There's a lot of movies that I *like* that I recognize are not 5-star worthy efforts in film making. I rated based on a mix general quality and my own taste, and elaborated in reviews where I felt inclined to. That way I could help others make viewing choices and tailor my own preferences at the same time. Now I can…
I was matched with a Larry the Cable Guy stand up special with a 94% match (UGH), and John Mulaney the Comeback Kid which I have watched at least 6 times in its entirety and had rated 5 stars was only a 72% match.
That's what different profiles are for. Theoretically each profile on one account gets their suggestions independent of the viewing/rating history of the other profiles.
I wonder if people are pitching jokes in the writer's room and another writer explains why it's factually flawed, and they keep the joke and give the explanation to Kent, and that's how all of Kent's dialogue is written.
This whole season has felt that way to me, save for Georgia.
There's a town in Texas called White Settlement. It's even more What it Says on the Tin than White City.
"linked to doubled risk of death"
I don't think it's biting the hand because I think it's pretty clear that Rachel Bloom is making fun of the idea of not caring about awards shows. She definitely cares about awards.
They stream all of their original shows Next Day on their website with no subscription required, and like half of the ads are just for other CW shows.
The Tonys struggle with how to present the Best Play nominees and each year they try something new. (Some years ago they did these slow-motion vignettes of the actors/set while someone summarized their stories, and while I thought that was cool it must have been a PAIN to coordinate getting pieces on and off for…
He did good bits but as a host, anything you do should be moreso about the people being recognized, and most of his bits felt like he was showing his own talents for the sake of it.
I didn't watch the previous season when it came out, and lost all interest when the spoilers were released in catching up.
My aunt saw me tagged in a photo with a man (who I am dating but she hadn't been told) and the first thing she texted me was questions about his grandfather's employment history. So, yeah.
He's not quite Top 40 radio, but his last two albums have both been top 10 on the Billboard 200.
Other people have a much stronger legal claim than this woman does, but even so, it's part of a pattern.