I would mock any white idiot who made that many typos in one statement. Holding someone to a different intellectual standard just because of his race is pretty much the definition of racism, though, so congratulations.

It's not an get off my lawn thing. You just don't get it.

I mean, I hope not. But it is possible. However, he's educating everyone reading his tweets so that's good too, right?

That host was a pro the whole way through

SO in closing, you're just not great around the kitchen.

Great — so you're a Gen X anti-semite homophobe. Any other winning qualities?

You're both wrong. He looks like he's sleepy and has brown hair.

or do a meta analysis and consider that his features which are heavily "ethnic" have been made synonyms with immorality because of subliminally racist imagery. Dov is a creep and probably a rapist, but much of the backlash against him seems to be coded.

Maslany is great; the show is not. But it's still entertaining enough, even though it's not well written. I hope Maslany gets opportunities on better shows/movies.

Why? The one reason I can see for it in the article boils down to it being a derisive and snarky way to make the same criticism, and you as an employee of Gawker have absolutely zero grounds for trying to tell people not to act in that fashion.

I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…

ETA: i'm not going to say which is which.