sarahconte01
angelgirl
sarahconte01

I'm not willing to argue that there should be more males in a show about a women's prison just because they comprise the majority of the prison population. That is a ridiculous argument. If the story is about people affected by the knockout game, then that's the one you tell, regardless of its demographic. This is

I just don't find it funny. Especially since I'm old enough to remember Bill Murray, Jane Curtain, Dan Ackroyd, Eddie Murphy, and Gilda.

I find Tina Fey pretty funny, but not Amy Poehler or literally any of the rest of the SNL cast after say. . .1993

Yeah, I agree. I was too old for that movie when it came out and though I often like kids' movies, I could not feign interest in it.

I'd forgotten he was his son! And wasn't Alan Thicke the one who pretty much pushed Tracey Gold into her downward spiral with his constant criticism? I mean, if you're working with someone that you know is that fragile, back the hell off, don't try to push her over the edge. That's just human decency. (PS I could

That's amazing.

Then someone should make that show. This is not that show. This is a show about women. In which some are shown to be stupid, all are flawed, some are plain mean, others were misled. I don't see why the complaint that the few male characters are just foils for the women is such a big deal. Female characters have

Have you *met* Kim Jong-un? Temper tantrums are his M.O.

"Ivy Pepper" sounds like someone's working idea that they forgot to come back to and refine.

Oh yes, it's terrible harmful. See? They're trying to marry the wrong people. The ones the fundies don't like. They want to marry people of their choice, not the ones chosen *for* them. And yeah, that's harmful. Not only is it harmful to their *souls,* it will harm the rest of us(somehow)! Won't someone think of

I was gonna say—I'm a 42DDD and I can hardly find regular bras to fit. Where do you get strapless?

Never said anyone was wrong in their preferences. However, if a person is shallow in their preference and alone, well, perhaps that person deserves to be alone. Many people don't like being valued for one superficial aspect, rather than as a whole person. I know I do not, especially since beauty fades. Also,

If you refuse to look at more than one aspect of a woman (ie her physical attractiveness) rather than everything she is and has to offer, then perhaps you deserve to be alone. Most women of real substance can see through that kind of bullshit and women who are super-attractive are not necessarily stupid or shallow.

Me too. I was 12 or 13 as well at a store in the mall, and an adult man slid his hand up my thigh and squeezed, then made eye contact with me and gave me a seductive look. I hurried out of there as quickly as I could go, afraid that he was following me and might do something worse. And what was worse was I was in

"Were" refers to "women," therefore it is appropriate. If the noun was "woman," the singular would be appropriate, but it's not.

*Four* men. Not that the ratio has much to do with it; he didn't fill pages about how men were evil, but let's not start making up numbers from thin air.

Props to you for educating yourself. It's not necessarily something all men are willing to do. However, I have to agree with many of my sisters on this thread because many men are willing to pass judgement on us, our bodies, and their normal processes (as well as what we should do with them) without actually

No, "fucking idiot" covers it. "Edgy" was what it was going for and it managed to land pretty squarely on "fucking idiot."

I was actually thinking that too. I've known a number of Christian Burmese folks and they are very kind people, but I'd imagine they're thinking "What on earth is she doing?"

So you went to one event where you were the only white person (once) and were treated as an oddity and so you feel that cultural appropriation is okay?