I’ve been following your comments...(ARH/PhD here). While I applaud your verve I must tell you that your efforts to educate the third-wavers will come to naught. Save your strength for the next pro-Belle-Knox post; you will need it!

Wow, the really mean comments about the human’s appearance...

The article is right though and that is the “hardest part” for most people. LÖL.

Our nouns are capitalised.

“I met Andy Warhol at a really chic party....”

German here. Particularly being from München, I’m very pleased with how everyone’s behaving. We’ve been gearing up for this since the end of 2014 when it was clear this was coming, and (kind of fulfilling the stereotype I guess), the system is running like clockwork as best as possible under the circumstances...

As a European living in New Zealand, one of the things that struck me about this story is the assumption of the Anglo-Saxon majority that us Euros don’t speak “English” (and either do the Kiwis as far as I’m concerned). If the OP had actually been from Denmark, she would have spoken English (and about five other…

I know this is unbelievable, but there are women in other parts of the world, and since I’m probably more familiar with the women in my major urban area than someone sputtering over their pumpkin spice latte with their mommy-and-me yoga ladies over an upstart FOREIGNER! OMG! choice of words, I actually can speak with…

I see what you are saying now...I thought you meant was I being satirical...

I’m glad you were able to isolate the crucial salient points of this story. I’m not from the U.S. and our word for the same category – for a man or a woman – is not fraught with all sorts of outrage, the same as people here don’t go berserk if someone who is white has curly hair or whatever. I’ll get back to you on…

It’s for “polyamorous.” It’s some relatively newish (though I think I’ve heard the term for about a decade, it just won’t seem to go away) for when people have such low self-esteem they won’t insist on a partner’s faithfulness, and thus develop an elaborate charade of being “open,” in a relationship with two other…

Thank you for your polite manner of disagreement – I do mean that sincerely because non-profanity laden discourse amid people with opposing opinions is rare to come by nowadays on Gawker.

Agreed about the addictiveness component...look at William Burroughs, etc. who were “Junkys” for years and years. I was commenting more on the OP’s great sense of despair...near-suicide by lack of risk aversion – going to a strangers’ house for an ostensible threesome (normally actually the disgusting dude forcing the…

Wow, that’s a really eloquent and beautiful of describing such a despairing situation. Substance addiction is our modern vampirism.

It’s...not a thing. The subculture of people who are “poly” and “chill” doing heroin casually with people they meet online is exceedingly small. Please don’t do this again. I don’t even know you and I care about you more than a bored poly housewife who’d give an inexperienced stranger heroin.

Why would it be satirical? The OP literally, not facetiously, recounts the extremes she went to to get the guy to have sex with her. If the genders had been reversed, the Jezebel sex-positive army would’ve been in the streets demanding the OP don a hair shirt and self-flagellate.

I don’t have much for this, sorry. I’m not clear on the part about not getting up and walking out after the part about the live-in baby/baby-mama came up. Oh, and spelling the word “jipped” doesn’t make it any less offensive. Sorry.

I don’t understand.

Yes, I agree. I noticed there was another pile-on on Lana del Rey yesterday as well, in a case that is similar in degree, in that del Rey qualified her earlier comments on her philosophical position on feminism.

So people who have degrees in Deleuzian semiotics deserve this? WTF.