BUT DID UKRAINE COLLUDE WITH THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN TO GET HER ELECTED???

Why? Because the President-elect slapped down two news organizations that tried to slander him?

IT COULDNT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN A JOKE.

Wait...what?

Nah, its just that his “scandals” weren’t real.

Yes, she did. Barack Obama literally called it his biggest regret because we had no plan in place for a post-Qaddafi Libya. Clinton took full responsibility. She went on TV and bragged about Qaddafi’s death because she thought it was a success. It ended up being a disaster.

LMAO.

1. Trump could very well take action that prevents jobs from leaving (i.e. if you want to move your factory so you can pay people 10 cents on the dollar to work in despicable conditions so you can sell your products to people on welfare here, you’re gonna pay a tax).

So you believe that Donald Trump of the Apprentice is a Russian plant?

1. “Rust-belt whitey” voted for the candidate that promised to tighten the labor market through immigration and enforce a stricter trade policy. That is the definition of voting in their interest.

Sure. Of course, had Clinton won, we’d be halfway toward WW3 with Russia. Seems like that won’t be the case with Trump. So even in your hypothetical, Trump isn’t even worse than the person he ran against, let alone the worst person in U.S. history.

What does this even mean? Did Wikileaks ever publish something fake?

Answer me this:

That’s exactly what Burneko is doing.

Its opposition research from the election. Mother Jones wrote about it on October 31st. Nothing was verified then. There’s a reason every single reporter turned it down and it was because there was nothing that could be substantiated. Think about how much the press hates Donald Trump: Everyone must have been working…

He shouted down people who slandered him using fake news....He was right to do so. These people have operated with no checks and balances for a long time and now its nice to have someone fighting back against them. Though I guess Peter Thiel started that.

I believe it was published under BuzzFeedNews. Which would make it appear to be real actual news.

Yes, obsolete jobs that are lost here and gained overseas so companies can pay people 10 cents on the dollar in wretched working conditions, then sell the products back to the people who just got canned.

But the Wikileaks stuff was true. It was relevant. And really Wikileaks was just an evening out of every single news outlet digging into Donald Trump trying to come up with something to bury him.

As opposed to the people who believe that Donald Trump is a puppet of Russia?