Honestly, people should just stop responding to this troll. 

Let’s wait until we’ve actually gotten rid of trump and beaten down the malignant cancer that is the republican party first though, ok? Please?

*Supposedly Feminist.

Exactly, call a conservative a whiny snowflake, and they’ll prove you correct right then.

- Vote like you actually give a crap about the functioning of the public school system.

Why should the Trump team spend any energy on this right now when the bob’s are doing the work pro-bono?

Or another alternative: There’s nothing fucking there.

Whoops, wrong reply. My bad, don’t drink and post folks! :D

About damn time.

I’m sure that they were worried that if they pissed off this administration, then they’d have jared targeting their shipments of PPE to steal. I mean if they’re stealing from the VA, is there anyone they won’t steal from?

How about a Heavy Duty Deli Slicer though, that’s still a good idea, right?  Asking for a friend...

Speaks to the key tactic in the republican playbook: Projection.

Yeah, certainly IMO letting the virus run wild until it burns itself out is a pretty irresponsible path to take. I guess we’ll see how Sweden fares. I think the choice between economic damage or a high body count is a false choice. The real choice is between economic damage or economic damage and a high body count.

The number I used was from people criticizing that study I believe (and admittedly on the low end, but I’m just ballparking what getting to “herd immunity” might actually cost in terms of lives...):

And it seems pretty contageous, so if it is possible, we’d need like say 80%+ of the people having had it. With recent studies suggesting the fatality rate is somewhere in the neighborhood of about 0.5%, that means 1.3 million deaths in the US. That’s the truth behind “Herd Immunity”.

And 5 days after people flood the streets, new infections will spike.

Just because they’re gone forever, doesn’t mean they won’t be back...

I mean physically largest, sure