You’re telling someone to get over something she barely registered when it happened. Seems like it’s more you who needs to get over it (and stop making excuses for why it’s okay to treat someone like shit because you find it entertaining.)

I agree. But it’s fucked up to excuse shitty behavior just because the person who was treated poorly wasn’t destroyed by the shitty behavior. If you think it’s acceptable to treat someone like shit because you witnessing it got a little thrill out of it or the person wasn’t permanently harmed, I’d counter that whoever…

I think the point is to encourage people to be more thoughtful rather than resort to knee jerk responses.

You know that your truth isn’t someone else’s, right? Cause what you really mean is he was speaking his opinion. An important lesson in life is that it is ill advised to offer your opinion at every opportunity. Like maybe when you’re shittng all over a teenager’s moment we can all agree that is the wrong time to tell…

I have fond memories of being small enough to fit under my bed, and falling asleep there.

Yep. The best I can come up with is the woman was blinded by a toxic love. I have some sympathy for that, but girl, go to therapy and apologize for how bad you treated your friends and let your boyfriend treat your friends and family!

No, but it seems you did. Or are you truly so stupid you fail to grasp that if you want to end an online conversation you no longer wish to participate it, the onus is on *you* to no longer engage?

Oh don’t be such an asshole. No one drank any kool aid here, which by the way is a reference to the Jamestown massacre. Could you be any more of a douche?

I have never once taken that to mean she literally wanted casseroles. She means she was expecting her friends to rally around her, care for her, help her out during a rough time. The kind of stuff you do for a friend when they or a loved one is sick - pick up their dry cleaning for them, if they have kids take the…

Honestly, it’s not hard for me to understand. You are the one having a hard time understanding why others would find a sexual partner who is solely focused on his or her own orgasm a selfish lover.

Except that’s not what is being discussed strawman. I haven’t argued that people shouldn’t expect orgasms with sex.

Selfless sacrifice, lol. Who said anything about me making selfless sacrifices. While I may not be as fortunate as you to be able to accurately predict when I’m going to or not going to climax prior to a sexual encounter, or be fortunate enough to be able to count on an orgasm from PIV sex most of the time, which…

You know, it’s perfectly fine d that you consider it a low bar for you. It it should not surprise you when you define it as a low bar that people take exception to you describing some of their relationship dynamics as a low bar.

Please don’t define my standards as a low bar. They are realistic and healthy. You do you, but my guess would be you doing you hasn’t involved a sustainable, long-term relationship. If it has, I think it’s great you found someone who doesn’t mind or even enjoys that you’re solely focused on your orgasms. Definitely…

Because when someone says they won’t ever, ever have sex unless they know they are going to get to have an orgasm is the definition of a selfish lover. It shows a complete lack of caring about their partner’s sexual desires. If I’m having sex with guy, and he just stops and says “oh well, I’m not going to blow my load…

You’re a very lucky lady then.

Who says anyone having maintenance sex is “acting” enthusiastic? This is kind of a false dichotomy “enthusiastic” or lying like log while someone is humping you thinking “beige, I’ll paint the ceiling beige.”

An unresponsive, uninterested, partner is not the same as a partner who wasn’t really feeling it and give his/her own druthers would have read a book before bed, but enjoys giving his/her partner pleasure and fulfilling that person’s physical needs. Maintenance sex is not someone lying there like a rag doll while…

Considering you just admitted the natural course of things in your own sexual encounters is to focus on your female partner first, and you described a typical male sexual response (when you’re done, you’re done), I take it you’re a man. Which makes it puzzling that you would go to such lengths to ignore what you’ve…

No. From the press release: