saiyazon
MiraiQ.
saiyazon

I was joking with someone about this earlier. It’s such a backwards, misogynist policy that the attempt at inclusive language rings super hollow. It’s like “Women should be in the kitchen” vs “Female-presenting people should be in the kitchen.” Great job, I guess?

yea, wouldn’t want to offend anyone as you apply puritanical dumbass arbitrarily sexist guidelines to your soon-to-be defunct shitpost blog site

“What about the children???!!?!?!!?!????!1" is tired and absurd. Telling people that their opinion will result in more raped children is so crazy that it can’t be true. How do people get this stupid?

I love the lack of awareness: “Damn Snowflakes get bent out of shape over PC bullshit and won’t play a song, so in response I get bent out of shape over anti-PC bullshit and boycott a radio station.” Even if the first group is as misguided as you say, how are your actions any different: over-reacting to the little

Almost every religion is the same, they all put their own thoughts in the god they adore and claim those thoughts are imposed by such god.

They do have a way with words, don’t they? We are not that far removed though. What a woman wears has often been considered, if not an enticement, certainly a contributory factor, should she cause her own rape.

Wee can haz fashion polieze in ‘’Mercia, maybes? Cuz many criminal outfits. Many.

You’re kidding yourself if you think Christians aren’t just as oppressive and backwards. You’ll find misogyny anywhere you find males of the species, which is everywhere.

More little boys who need to grow up and take responsibility for their own boners rather than projecting their frustrations onto others.

WTF? “incitement to debauchery”? Yeah maybe teach your menfolk to get control of themselves, go and have a quiet wank if it works them up that much, and let the woman whose actual job is to perform wear whatever it is she wants (it wasn’t even that revealing). I’m thinking about rape cases over there where what the

It’s not “defending it in cutesy social context.” She WANTS to stay. she is making the *choice* to stay despite the perception of being “bad” for having sex.

Jen Kirkman posted a thread about this on Twitter the other day.

Because she spends the entire song telling him all the social consequences she’ll face if she stays and he keeps pressing. Whether she would prefer staying or not, she doesn’t want all of the negatives that she’ll endure if she does. There’s no “cover” sufficient for that time period.

People are being willfully ignorant about this song at this point. The historical context has been explained ad nauseum re: the woman wanting to stay but being unable to say so explicitly due to social norms at the time and the man trying to give her reasons to stay so as to provide her with cover. And the line

Now playing

When Miley actually calms down and just does her OWN thing, as opposed to trying to “shock” everyone with how “outrageous” she is.....she’s actually enjoyable and talented. I hope this sticks.

I have to agree. Remy’s opinions on State of The Culture show her internalized misogyny and are hard to relate. Maybe she thinks that should be her stance as hip hop veteran, that she has to act all tough and be a misogynist. She makes Joe Budden seem super open in comparison and he’s an out and out curmudgeon.

Attacking a female artist in the industry about being a "slut" or using sexual favors to get ahead is so damn lazy. And also... So what if she did hook up with producers/DJs whatever? That doesn't mean it contributed to her success. I mean I'm no Cardi stan but Nicki hasn't put out good music in a minute. That Chun-Li

As Brigit pointed out these guys used some of the new hotness dating methods that work on non-organic materials, or where carbon dating is otherwise not applicable.

But that still mostly just tells you the date of a material. So basically it all boils down to statigraphy. Sediment builds up in layers. Those layers are

Scientists always change their story because majority of academia is fake. I know this because I worked in the field of algae biofuels for over 6 years and wrote more than 20 papers. Especially in saturated fields of research, scientists manipulate and publish false data all the time. In a well established fields such