So much more time is going to be wasted in video games just looking at crap...

I already have one...it's called a Samsung Galaxy 7.0 Plus. An awesome table I got for $250.

Amen brother.

Always Amazon (or some other way) and never iTunes. iTunes always seems to be more expensive and controlling.

Just rub weed and gunpowder all over your body before going to the airport and let the fun begin.

I'm no fanboy of either Apple or Google (for the record I have an iPhone), but my Samsung 7 Plus Android tablet is awesome and was only $250 on sale. It lighter than and iPad, has expandable storage, IR control, more customization/access, and has better resolution than an iPad 2.

I wouldn't go that far...I've seen a handful of 3D movies and I'd say some were neutral to the experience (which = a waste of the extra money) while others added to it. Thor and Megamind were cool in 3D.

There were electronics in this video?

I'm a dry guy. #Workaholics

My "fat" thumb?!? I prefer big boned...

It's time travel.

Samsung Blackjack. It was ok. Lots of bloatware that I had to hack to remove. But the full keyboard for texting was nice.

I picked up the Samsung Galaxy 7 Plus for $250 (16 GB w/ expandable microSD) and have never looked back. An awesome tablet that I highly recommend. I didn't like the Fire/Nook mainly because of the lack of pure OS and lower specs.

Helpful hint: I use all natural, Seventh Generation thyme oil cleaning spray (Target, Safeway, etc.) which kills 99.99% bacteria on my sponge (both sides), squeeze a few times to get it in the sponge, add dish soap, and start washing.

Real quick...I wan't trying to make anything political. I'm a science teacher so I try to combat ignorance first (even my own).

"I believe this good coverage by fox is politically modivated but it doesn't change the fact that it is good coverage." Fair enough. I'm glad you recognize it's politically motivated coverage.

I'm a little confused on your reply. Are you saying that adult stem cells are better than embryonic or that they are more used in research?

True, but those were very quick web searches, not DVR-ing news reports. Even so, I'm sure actual TV channels like BBC and CNN are covering it completely, just maybe not as much as FN (which we discussed their motives previously). Another way to put that is that CNN, BBC, etc. isn't holding anything back with regards…

I 100% agree! However, the simple point I'm making is that Fox News is not the one and only organization covering this story completely. Plenty of others are as well. I don't feel short changed, misinformed, or wanting more info about Fast and Furious after reading about it on others news sites.

"Harping" is such a subjective term. Regardless, you hit the nail on the head when you said that they want to make the administration look bad. That fact, and that fact only, is their only purpose for "harping" on this story. But again, this doesn't mean good journalism because what you're implying is that no one else…