You can pretty much apply your first sentence to anything that HamNo writes.

So the moviegoing audience should unionize?

Better idea:

Didn’t everybody laugh it off as ridiculous when Trump asked “ I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after?” It looks that really is the goal after all.

Dr. Henry Bello. I expect Gizmodo will drop the story now.

“Everything in politics cannot be solved by compromise. Abortion is legal, or it’s not. That awful Supreme Court justice is confirmed, or he’s not. Pollution is properly regulated, or it’s not. Our tax system is sufficiently progressive, or it’s not. We go to war, or we don’t. Every one of these choices is ultimately…

There’s no gray in Hamilton’s world. Only black and white.

this guy is woke- his summer school freshman philosophy professor will give this a solid B

This may be true for YOU and YOUR political views, but there are plenty of people out there who aren’t on the fringes of politics and prefer a more centrist, moderate approach. There is nothing wrong with wanting, say, pro-choice rights for women, marriage equality, AND lower taxes and smaller government.

Yeah, thats dumb as shit.

Hillary not winning equals sexism

Are they bad because they came here “illegally?”

Oh sir, I looked at the Class A Shares Beneficially Owned in the SEC link and Kraft does not have 5%, he has less than 1%. Your emphasized section says:

So you are essentially saying the “society” as a whole and government has more right to the money I earned during my lifetime than my heirs?

From the headline I was sure this was going to be about Peggy Noonan.

It’s certainly fascinating to watch the comments on this site. You would think defamation of a female in general would generate outcries of support, but due to her associations with right wing politics and the choice of who she married, this whole section reads like a slut-shaming article that this site would normally…

They should unionize.

Because the girl lied about two of the guys, so she was proven to be a bad witness that a prosecution couldn’t rely on. She originally said the first two guys raped her, but there is video evidence contradicting her. So everything she says after the fact is tainted.

Or you know, three of the players were pretty well proven to have had nothing to do with what happened. Sorry for bringing facts to your soap box.

Why? Because you know they are guilty of violating the student code of conduct? How did you obtain evidence of that?