ry0uki
101 100 001 10011
ry0uki

i'm always aggressive with words i think =X equally sweet too if that's the taste i have in my mouth when thinking of words to tell someone, but i'm more careful with that.

it's a shame about the brokenness tho, ahahah, i feel like that's the main drive behind making URF mode a different game. a little balancing would

ah, i see. makes more sense that way.
look, i can totally accept if it is not your game type... i get the love to win but that you can also do just the same.

what i feel like i must say is, don't let other's talk limit you out of such a lovable genre of gaming. just thick-skin it. it may help to avoid dealing with toxic

it's 'kay, plenty of oranges came with the talks xD
i apologise for whatever you consider i could have done better, i probably could..

man the perspective i had when i didn't knew anything is so different, so nostalgic.. because there was only possibility on the horizon. endless potential and OP things. now? bah. you

so you are that sensible. don't you think that may be wrong objectively speaking?
you are limiting yourself because someone who does not know you even said something about you that you didn't like. if i tell you how immature your comment is, you will never comment kotaku again? that is not my objective but rather the

these days, the toxic are the one's enjoying the anti-toxicity more.. talking to anyone to say anything will net anyone "flamer" "toxic" and "report for verbal blabla" responses often and most times, not as a joke.

telling facts is now considered flaming. like "you died because you went alone to the enemy base versus

yup, sad. y u mad bro?

" Nocturne was the first champion I owned. I was absolutely terrible with him. It was great." that right there.. so precious.. man i can't tell you how it made me feel, cus i get it so well xD

i just wanted to comment because people reading your comment would easily get the wrong idea. it's not so easy to get a champ

this right here. i can 100% understand what you mean. that line though, maybe it would be best to block that troll and see if you could still pull out a good encounter with other humans in Souls.. i support fighting the trolls instead of having them limit your life.

mind you, i did my 1st run on Souls mostly offline. i

you'd be amazed.. it doesn't too often, but it can i suspect.. some things you spend need to be controlled at all times and FS actually learned that due to the, hmm, creativity of the Souls community.

but Demons is the oldest. it's the safest and more linear about saving timings. i interrupt games all the time and

i do not care what some random site says, if you play on average >2h a day, EVERYDAY, that is outside the realms of casual. that's a pretty full fledged habit .

casuals will suffer the most defeats, so your best case scenario may be borderline low in terms of time required but the average will be well above that. not

*Kotakus. otaku is the original term, kotaku the modification of the term that they picked to name the site. which make us, if anything, kotakus... weird, i know...

no casual amount of hours will net you 6300ip in a week. that's just simple math.. making 6300 in a month, is still no casual matter, though i case can be made for softcore gaming..

man it must be sad to be as stupid as you are..
1- i am not bitching, and what i am saying, is exactly Riot has nothing to do with fighting piracy as the point is moot for their business model.
2- maybe an idiot like you who can't read doesn't get it, for one, i said i'm fine with league the way it is, but i wouldn't

But still, hats off to Paradox for being one of the companies (Riot are another prominent example) who tackle the issue the "nice" way, and are seemingly happy (and are being rewarded with sales: Skylines sold 250,000 copies in two days) for their approach.

anyone remembers black face =/

but "mentally challenged" is so long! i have failed to get a good replacement, that is my issue, otherwise i would have retired it..

indeed, you bring a good point!!

the is a difference in the kinds of discrimination that are racist or just plain logical..
for instance: you try to contribute or not harm a pregnant woman's life.
she is different than most humans. and in most cultures its some degree of the same...
case in point, if a nation is 100%, and

well communicating is the way for us to gain something for the mind from each other ^^ i'm very rash to speak and take shortcuts, but i always think about what i say. i happen to appreciate talks this type.. to me, i found someone intelligent, which means no matter what we can perfectly exchange information, odds are

i get you man.. but i like it.. i don't mean it as the people affected by a clinical condition, rather an arbitrary one. but i may be able to understand why you are against the word.

as i have been very vocal about some previous league articles you wrote, i feel the need to really praise you on this one. bravo. see? you can do it if you want to too.. and this is a subject very hard for someone new to the game to tackle as people don't always realize fully the consequences in depth of some