rustybucket
rustbucket
rustybucket

Oh man, it’s hard to decide. While I appreciate the subtlety of the metal nuts over the in-your-face nature of the TruckNutz, I feel like anyone buying the latter has a sense of humor about it, whereas I can see someone chaining a pair of huge machine nuts to their truck thinking they are an actual badass. Combine that

Yeah, but the E-Golf isn’t even close to what iska2000 is suggesting. Think more like an electric WRX competitor. If the price premium for going electric isn’t too crazy, I think they would sell at least as well as any other “performance” model.

Calm down, guy. It’s just branding. I always wonder when I see stuff like this, same thing with the Mach-E, what are people’s lives like that they get this worked up over something this insignificant?

Hey. I just want to be clear. In this one particular scenario at least, #notallwhitepeople

These are good. You like the good cars in the nice colors, with the interesting but reasonable wheels. Please share your influence with your angular wedge-loving, block-wheel fetishizing cohorts.

I would venture to say that the Miata is Mazda’s “halo” car. First thing that comes to mind when people think of Mazda, and embodies the fun and affordable ethos of the brand.

You besmirch the name of the PS1! A freaking Sega Genesis could render a more realistic looking car than this thing. It’s literally like 11 polygons, max.

Counterpoint: these are terrible.

Will it be offered with a manual? Or even a traditional automatic? Literally anything other than a fucking CVT? Please? It’s a decent looking Civic/Corolla alternate, but if it’s as shitty to drive as the last loaner Sentra I had when my Frontier was in for service (2016 I believe) then it will be utterly irrelevant

So I guess automakers don’t know about trypophobia? Seriously, stop just putting holes where they don’t look like they belong. Change the material in that section, at least.

I’m excited by the technical aspects of this vehicle, but I do think they could have made it better looking if they hadn’t been so caught up in trying to replicate the Mustang styling. In profile it looks nice, and I absolutely agree that it looks better than the bulbous garbage that is the X6 and it's ilk, but I

I don’t know much/anything about “focus testing”, but automotive designs lately have me convinced they just present two different ugly designs and say “Which of these do you prefer?” with no section for “What do/don’t you like about the design?”. It’s the only explanation.

I originally thought the only thing I found truly offensive was the front end, but the more I look at it, I hate the back end too. I understand wanting capitalize on the Mustang styling elements, but it just doesn't work.

I always wonder, couldn’t they do SOMETHING with the airflow from a traditional grill? Because the alternative from most companies seems to be horrible front end design.

So my question is what was the actual logic behind the placement of the lever? The only “reasonable” excuse I can think of is that it would allow the driver to reach over and let the seat forward for rear seat passengers, but I don’t know why this would be in any way superior to positioning it so that the passenger

The chrome halo looks nice on the dark grey and might on black as well, but it looks terrible on the blue and I imagine it will on pretty much any other color. Possibly it’ll be ok on white, but only because it will be less noticeable.

I mean, it’s definitely much better. I find myself moved from the camp of “Why would they even attempt to make a Sonic movie?” to “Huh. A Sonic movie.”

I can appreciate wanting something different, to have options. But I also don’t think different automatically means good, and I think all of the early Infinitis(Infinitii?) were hideous. The reason reason they became less and less distinguishable from the other brands, at least aesthetically, is because like other

I know I love for someone to sultrily lean against me in full scuba gear..