Does it count as “starting a clothing line” if you just photoshop some text you didn’t even bother to kern onto cafepress images of blank clothes you didn’t make?

She was too masculine! She was too feminine! She was too aggressive and harsh! She was too frail! She was too progressive! She was too moderate! She was too incompetent! She was a diabolical mastermind! She was stiff, rigid, uptight! She was going to keel over at any moment!

Right-wing pinheads who think Duck Dynasty was too cerebral are busy trying to legibly write out the announcement of their intent to boycott Broadway; psuedo-progressive pinheads who spent the past year and a half telling everyone to “shake up the system” by voting third-party, writing in Bernie or just staying home…

To summarize, your 3 best pieces of evidence that the DNC sabotaged Bernie Sanders are:

Their reply really exposes that it’s not that they didn’t agree with Hillary’s policies, just her blatant belief that she deserves to be in her position. Voters like this just want to take a powerful woman down a peg. It’s boring, and infuriating all at once.

I’m sure the lack of enthusiasm that the DNC, its support system, and its donors felt for Bernie Sanders had nothing to do with the fact he was an Independent for 40 years—one who switched to the Democratic party solely to make his run easier.

They just cite Elizabeth Warren and Jill Stein to convince themselves and whoever’s listening that their Hillary Derangement Syndrome isn’t just sexism. They like the idea of a female president right up until one actually stands a chance of winning.

Because she got more votes in the primaries? I voted for Bernie Sanders in the MO primary by the way. Did the Democratic establishment prefer a longtime member with tons of experience and fairly Obama-style moderate views over the extremely liberal independent from Vermont (yes I know he caucuses with the party)? Yes.…

It’s a troll. It has to be.

I hate to say it, but this story is actually about Ethics In Journalism.

No way.

This is why you don’t trust populists, kids. I don’t care whether they have a D, an R, or an I next to their name, the only thing a populist is good for is telling you that you’re right to be angry and that they can make it all better. They are not good at actually making it better.

The fundamental problem I experienced throughout this election was rampant MISOGYNY, misinformation, rumor, distortion of facts and overall ignorance of who Hillary was and what she has fought for her entire life. Including whatever you are trying to imply here. Your projecting onto me whatever bigotry that you think…

I believe that love IS the answer ... but not the kind of passive, feel-good, saccharine platitudes and symbolic kind deeds that Van Jones seems to be talking about. The kind of love that we need is challenging and revolutionary and ACTIVE, and it isn’t the same thing as simple niceness.

No, it’s not. We offer the best policies for blue collar workers, across the board. The ones that vote against that just to register how much they hate foreigners are not the ones we need to be trying to retain. We need to appeal to independents, and try to turn out the vote among younger voters, instead of…

*shrugs* I’m pragmatic and feel like ideological purity is partly what got us Trump in the first place. Like do you want a Bolton or Giuliani? As much as it’d be just desserts to have the country burn down on Trump’s watch, living in NYC can only isolate me so much.

I’ve seen a lot of online posts saying that we need to work to understand the “Trump voter.” That liberal elitism prevented us from seeing/reaching the scared middle-American who saw their way of life slipping away. But, seriously, fuck that nonsense. I grew up in a small Alaskan town and I got out. I’ve gone back…

Yeah, but were the Hillary voters choosing her because she is better for democracy or because they hoped she’d be a benevolent progressive dictator.

This is Donald Trump’s America.