ruckcohlchez--disqus
Ruck Cohlchez ?
ruckcohlchez--disqus

And weirdly, Great News had an episode last week where multiple characters referred to "large naturals." Maybe Tina Fey discovered a phrase she finds hilarious.

It's both! He's a New York gay man; "Boobs in California" is the antithesis of everything he believes in.

Perhaps, roughly, "grab them by the pussy"?

Have you heard the good news seen Great News?

OK, I can maybe accept Assemblyman Zellman, although my official position remains "Anyone who refers to him as anything other than 'Boon' is wrong."

Yeah, sure, of course there was. But I think a lot of that has been well-catalogued, and I wasn't interested in, as I said, the reaction of angry Internet man-boys, so much as I was in the genuine problems with the writing for the character.

I kind of hope Erlich strikes some dumb deal with Jian Yang that leaves him the owner of Erlich's house.

On the one hand, this sucks a lot. On the other hand, if they write him out with some twist that ends up with Jian Yang owning his house… hilarious.

All the jokes about the "Hey Hey, It's Wednesday" menu items were hilarious.

I was surprised the review didn't mention the Bay to Breakers parallel or that the bars Teddy named were obviously gay bars.

Yeah, I did not understand why Bob volunteered all that information to Jimmy Pesto. Do you want him to sabotage your plans? Because that's what he'll do.

I'm pretty sure it was and that "Bog to Beach" was a deliberate reference, too. To say nothing of the bars being named the "Bear Trap" and the "Clam (something, I forget)."

I really got a kick out of the running gag of the fake British references. The show seems increasingly confident regarding the surrounding details and the style of humor it's going for, and I'm really excited for season two.

Right? The show is not going to focus on Jake in federal prison, so it seems like a weird cheat to end this way.

Well, putting aside the sense of how angry man-boys on the Internet react to things as though that matters…

I don't think Jimmy is perfect, and he's certainly full of ethical lapses, but I also think his heart is generally in the right place and he tries to do right by the people he cares about. The tragedy is that he has put so much time and effort into caring for and trying to earn the respect of someone who utterly hates

Right, aging on whiskey only counts the time in the barrel. That Macallan was distilled in 1966, aged until 2001, and then packaged, distributed, etc. until it got to Howard and he finally opened it.

I'd have to go check, but someone elsewhere in the comments mentioned that the check HHM sends to Chuck is dated May 2002. I also think it's Word of God that the show starts in 2002, six years before the events of Breaking Bad.

The very first episode of the series is set in 2002, and they don't go back in time.

Is there a spoiler space for this season? It would be great to direct people who've seen the whole season to it, because all the hint-dropping about what happens later is getting old.