rubikun
Rubi
rubikun

The term "queer" and the LGBT umbrella are more or less synonymous, except when they're not used the same way (LGBT is sometimes written as LGBTQ to include "queer" as an extra catch-all for not-straight, not-cis people who might not specifically use any of the other terms). Being non-binary is a gender issue on the

Labelling non-binary sexuality can be confusing. Typically if they're not bi (anecdotally most non-binary people I've met have been bi) they tend to label based on whatever pole of the gender spectrum they feel closer to (someone who's non-binary but feels more feminine than masculine and is attracted to boys would

The other thing is when the specific thing that reads as "not normal" about them at a glance is flamboyant queerness/gender noncomformity, the first comment came across as if you were implying that it's expected for flamboyant queer people to also be sexual predators, which is a really bad stereotype.

This is a bad comment.

Non-binary can mean many things to different people, but it just means you don't feel entirely male or female. Which could mean specific pronoun preferences (or alternately no preference at all in regards to pronouns), and can involve some degree of transitioning to reduce dysphoria if that's an issue though not to

Bard students knew about them. I didn't hang out with them but from what I've heard Ben was at the very least a jerk and people generally liked Liv but aren't sure how to feel about her after this news.

cncrds

LOL, one of the "crit" blogs I saw insults the show by calling it "Steven Liberalverse"

Game of Thrones has a lot of likable characters. Tyrion's a funny, likable underdog. Arya's totally badass. Jon Snow's solid as the show's most traditional hero. Daenerys is interesting because you're never sure if she's going to do the right thing or if her power's going to drive her insane. Jamie's fascinating

Unlikable characters seems like an odd complaint about Game of Thrones and Attack on Titan, as most of the reason those shows are successful is that people like (some of) the characters enough to follow them through the darkness.

Are you saying Steven Universe is bad LGBT representation? Because, no. It's awesome. It's a show created by a queer woman with at least three major queer characters who are all awesome. What is your complaint there? Best I can tell you seem to think that Beach City is "too accepting" to be realistic. But it's

Bojack is great but I wouldn't recommend watching it out of order at all. The episodes you picked in particular wouldn't have nearly the same impact without context.

Lars is like the exact opposite of fat, though, making his chest odder if he's not trans.

Eh, as someone who could technically be considered pansexual but just says bi because more people know what it means, the two terms are almost identical.

Eh, considering he's pansexual and not a Milo-esque self-hating turd, I think not.

Culture and race are two different things. You're free to emerse yourself in any culture you want, you can't change your race (given that the construct of race is defined by ancestry). Even if you have physical dysmorphia (which is a different from specific gender dysphoria), Michael Jackson never claimed to be white