lol clever

And how would the author deal with felons?

This is cogent. It’s also wrong. Working is what God put us here for— whether you earn a living or support a family. The suggestion that you deserve anything for free, except God’s grace, is misinformed. The contestant winner is a good role model. This author is not.

This is ignorant and racist. Both Dr King and James Earl Jones for instance spoke with distinctive educated black voices. Both are better speakers and thinkers than you.

Should be disenfranchisE

I’d rather have the cherokee professor discuss the tribe’s history of owning black slaves and trying to disenfranchis black tribal members.

This whole article is low and crude

This is admirable, militant and educated. More like it please

Again unnecessarily crude. We used to know we can do better, and tried to. In the age of Trump so many relish crudity. In this Trump and the author accept and share the same milieu. Resistance to Trumpism includes insistence on higher standards. The author failed in that duty with her foul mouthed language.

Would be more persuasive if more nuanced by examples of her errors. “You’re stupid” , “no you are”, ultimately fails as argument at both ends. Nonetheless I empathize with the author’s frustration.

Btw Douglass, Bethune, King and Marshall to name a few were far more incisive without profanity. The claim that you are somehow too indignant to speak without vulgarities is just more proof that the article needed more thought.

Foul language destroys the author’s credibility.

The objection by the author is not valid. She expresses opinions about “white” topics all the time. There is nothing wrong with the painting. The author would have done better to join the white people at Middlebury protesting the odious Charles Murray. Who makes a comment is rarely as important as what the comment is.

Right on point. And it goes to show why we have to protest white supremacists like Charles Murray when they pop their ugly heads up. No I’m not going to “debate” you about whether blacks are subhuman. You lost that debate when you asked the question

Um, the man admits he is still unpacking the film after seeing it twice. ‘nuff said about the author’s mental swiftness. Or for the sake of the author: ‘nuff said about his mental swiftness.

Crude, crude, crude. Who needs bush to stand in the way of black progress when we have people who think and write with such poverty of language? I repeat: gates should be ashamed; DuBois and king are ashamed. And Univision: la dolce vita (ok, that’s Italian).

I don’t find similar vulgarities on the owner’s Spanish sites. I have to conclude this is now meant to be a coon show. I am ashamed for the people who sold this site allegedly on the premise that it continued a tradition starting with Douglass and DuBois. It’s now worthy only of stepin fetchit. vinceramos indeed

This is crude. The author also misuses the word threshold. 🙄

Stop the profanity. Makes you look ignorant

Important to note: Clark misquoted Mrs Obama