ronswan69
RonSwan69
ronswan69

My first thought exactly! Hopefully its as capable. And has an aftermarket.

Idk, I kinda have to agree with Pete on this. There may only be 20 B-2s but with each capable of carry 50k lbs of nuclear or conventional weapons that's 1 million lbs of hate and discontent coming from a small number of aircraft. Also, in a real conflict these would not spend most of their time on the ground. B-2

I knew there would be one to take it the wrong way. I don't care that you choose to abuse and kill your body. Yes, you deserve to have those seats. All I'm saying is this research was done in regards to the work market but they did it on leather seats whereas the work market buys trucks with cloth seats. So they

I have 2 problems with this: 1. This is only for the leather seats where as the big, burly guys who work 10 hour days getting in and out of their trucks most likely have work models aka cloth or standard seats. So all this testing and research when into the wrong seats. 2. Doesn't this just perpetuate our obese

Wayyyy more then that when you consider the program cost and all the years that have gone into it with materials and labor. But I agree the "older" platforms we use now are just as capable. Just not as stealthy which is a moot point in today's conflicts.

"Reps from Ram and General Motors maintain that they will adopt the standard when a competitor does"

That huge chrome lower bumper is just annoying though. If they shortened it then I would like it but that lack of ground clearance sends me away.

"Somebody's got to come up with a way to have the bench front seat AND giant center console storage."

Does anyone else think that front end photo of the taco makes it look dopey?

After I commented I went and saw the "new" HP numbers. Carry on good sir.

A turbo 4 with ONLY 180 HP. What is this? The early 00's. N/A 4's make between 160-190 these days and the turbo 4s put out by the factories make anywhere from 220-280.

While desert isn't necessarily difficult terrain to cover (I mean Top Gear did it in jalopies, right?) there are environments that need the increased capability. Jungle warfare for example. The muddy trails of southeast Asian countries require some serious offroad capability for military operations. Also, for us

Oh I agree completely. This guy just threw parts at this truck thinking it would magically make it offroad worthy when I'm sure the stock form would do better at this point.

I agree that a FabTech lift is not race ready as I have one on my truck but it is by no means a bad lift kit. Its great for general offroading and hooning. I've never felt like I was roll over in my truck. I'm also the second owner of the lift. But yes, a desert racing lift it is not. Those triple bypass shocks in the

Myself and my non-small penis would like to have a word with you.

I'm relaxed. Just have a profound hatred for the PT loser and HHR

DON'T YOU DARE COMPARE THOSE MONSTROSITIES TO TRUCKS!

So what you're saying is I can now take my PBR cans and have them recycled into a new part to fix my truck? That's going green if you ask me.

Why did Chevy steal Dodge's MDS idea and just rename it Active Fuel Management? Ohh burnnn fanboy, burnnnnn

Here's your reason. These probably came from the Marine Corps honestly. The USMC is trying to get rid of all its MRAPs as it starts to back out of Afghan. The MRAP is too heavy to fill the USMCs amphibious role (as in its too heavy for any ship to shore craft). They only had them because they needed them in Afghan but