So it’s an MMO? Was Destiny really that fucking fabulous? I mean I have read nothing but bitching and moaning about that game for literally years now, but everyone needs to make a clone FFS? How much money does Cyberpunk have to make to get these fuckers to make a couple more games like CD Project Red?

That is what it’s felt like for me since it was first announced - this game is EA trying to milk the last few drops out of the Bioware name, before giving it the Old Yeller treatment.

Call me a pessimist, but this looks like a killer game...as in, it will kill Bioware.

I’m called a libtard SJW enough to have my progressive credentials, but I’m OK with Valve’s take on this. I’m not ready to say it’s good vs bad, but I also think a good vs bad judgment is missing the point.

Almost no one. For years and year writers have been complaining about it and I have never talked to any regular Joe that uses it the way these writers do.

I bet Valve is also seeing what’s coming down the pipeline. By policing content, the big “platforms” like Twitter are now changing into publishers. (or at least you can now start arguing this in courts.) PragerU vs. Google’s Judge’s decision alluded to this.

Valve wants no part of the incoming “you published this on…

Genuine, honest question here: Who really browses the store and relies on Steam’s built-in systems to find new games? Do those people actually exist (No, people specifically looking for crap games to stream and ridicule don’t count)?

I’ve been using Steam for damn near 8 years and I think I’ve looked at sale pages…

“Steam’s Irresponsible Hands-Off Policy Is Proof That Valve Still Hasn’t Learned Its Lesson”

Good move, Valve. A platform should be an agnostic canvas for artists, not a playing field for corporations to push their morals on others. 

This is just another example of Valve punting away all responsibility.

I’d rather not have haphazard censorship in digital stores. Thanks.

Why *should* it be Valve’s responsibility to decide what people are not allowed to play?

This is just another example of Valve punting away all responsibility.

This is just another example of Valve punting away all responsibility.

I love how you made it ambiguous enough to apply to both sides of the political spectrum. Because it’s absolutely true.

It’s almost like review scores are bad. ;)

Kotaku:

This game seems to have been panned by most major reviewers, but I enjoyed it. Was it perfect? No. But it was a perfectly enjoyable title.

It’s like you channeled Statler and Waldorf for that one. Very good.

Since you’re the second person to mention it, let me respond: There’s nothing in saying “This article only exists for a click” that implies “And only dumb people would click on it.” If it exists for that very purpose, it’s probably tailor-made to get that response. I’m not saying consumers shouldn’t click on…