Exactly my thought: we already have Temple Run the Movie, because Temple Run itself is a pastiche of Raiders of the Lost Ark and everything that was inspired by it.

You gotta give him props for at least practicing trigger discipline.

Haven't EA already admitted that the cloud was BS?

Or, wait for a Steam sale, when they'll be discounted anyway.

To be fair, the Infinite bashers were present at launch day. Yeah, there were a lot of 9/10 reviews, but there were guys who complained about the convoluted plotlines, the perceived ludonarrative dissonance, and the slightly janky controls. Even the 9/10 guys would cite at least the latter two as the reason for them…

I call it the George Lucas experience: when your myth-building is so good, not even you can recreate its majesty. Instead, you'll make up some stupid shit like midichlorians.

So, I'm guessing you haven't finished it. Just trust us when we say it's a shared universe.

No, you're just misremembering. There was only one flashback-heavy episode, and maybe two episodes that were drawn out longer than they should've been. The former would be Mikasa's character-defining episode (which was a flashback to make a point), while the latter two would be near the tail end of the Trost Defense…

As Scooby said, it makes sense for the business, but not the consumer. Imagine, if you will, if Sony released the Bluray copy of Amazing Spider-man, and other non-Sony Bluray players couldn't play that movie.

Hell, you started this whole hypothetical with your crazy talk about exclusives being games held hostage...

If games made first party by Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo started to become multiplatform because everyone agreed they were 'holding a game hostage', then there would cease to be a purpose to consoles altogether.

I will never understand this fervent support for consoles based on exclusives. You know that exclusivity is anti-consumer, right? They're basically holding a game hostage, and unless you give them $400 and a private jet bound for Libya, you'll never get to play that game.

No, it's not the extensions per se; I keep my Chrome relatively clean. What burdens it is having multiple tabs with Flash opened. After about 30 tabs, I start to notice performance issues.

I'm talking about people who report all kinds of issues with Internet Explorer. Those guys caused all their problems in the first place, clicking 'Yes' to every section of a free software's EULA, without checking if that 'Yes' is still for the software they downloaded and not for a third-party toolbar or plugin.

Speak for yourself. I've got all three browsers installed on two different computers. Guess which browser crashes the most? If your answer was Internet Explorer, you'd be very, very wrong.

Amen, brother! This is what most people don't realize: any issues with IE are mostly user error.

WTF are you even talking about? That's not how Windows programs work. You can keep IE installed, and so long as you're not using it, it will not eat away at your performance.

Well, that decision is being made by an out-of-touch CEO, so I guess that bad decision is well within their narrative?

Yeah, I get it, it's a metaphor for America's drone-fear. Still not sold, because its diametrically opposed to what the original Robocop stood for.

Shame it's not real (duh, the actual expansion will be counted in GB, not MB). Or that you can't at least buy them. I've got an old 3.5-inch drive somewhere in the garage, would be awesome to plug it in and actually use it one last time. For something other than Quest For Glory II.