But that's just it. He's always had good publicity, so any actions against him are viewed in the negative.
But that's just it. He's always had good publicity, so any actions against him are viewed in the negative.
To be fair, that trope was in Pitch Black as well — Riddick takes a lock of Fry's hair while she's talking to Johns at the bone pit. After cutting out that bit, he sniffs it, before letting it drift upon the wind.
Speak for yourself. I've got all three browsers installed on two different computers. Guess which browser crashes the most? If your answer was Internet Explorer, you'd be very, very wrong.
Amen, brother! This is what most people don't realize: any issues with IE are mostly user error.
WTF are you even talking about? That's not how Windows programs work. You can keep IE installed, and so long as you're not using it, it will not eat away at your performance.
Well, that decision is being made by an out-of-touch CEO, so I guess that bad decision is well within their narrative?
Yeah, I get it, it's a metaphor for America's drone-fear. Still not sold, because its diametrically opposed to what the original Robocop stood for.
As in, it doesn't feel like a TV show based on the Marvel Comics universe.
Shame it's not real (duh, the actual expansion will be counted in GB, not MB). Or that you can't at least buy them. I've got an old 3.5-inch drive somewhere in the garage, would be awesome to plug it in and actually use it one last time. For something other than Quest For Glory II.
That narration was... weirdly pronounced. He says melee as "may-LEE" instead of the common "MAY-lay". He then goes on to pronounce elite as "A-leet" instead of "eh-LEET".
Also, tracking and vertical hold artifacting.
What? No, the 80's is still a bad idea. We only appreciate it now because of nostalgia.
Not the best faux-80's video I've seen. First off, the aspect ratio's off. It's on 16:9 even though an 80's video would be 4:3. Second, the wipes are too nice and clean. Where are the shitty dissolves?
So... bacon?
Firefox addons get exploited just as heavily. I even have screenshots from a friend whose Facebook account started sending weird messages because of it:
To be fair, this is one that that still hasn't worn out its welcome, at least to its core demographic.
Dude, my dad gets malware even with a security suite and Chrome. At some point, you have to stop blaming the software and start blaming the user who keeps clicking "yes" to every part of the EULA without reading. Or the person who sees one ad for cute emoticons and immediately clicks away. Or someone who keeps…
Er, it's just a theory I postulated, dude. As you can see, I was the first one who complained about the horrible typos.
Aside from HTML5 support, those are untrue. I've been using IE10 for a while now, and yeah, I replaced Bing with Google (which took like two seconds and hardly any effort), and I've never had any "sponsored" browser button bars. Perharps you done goofed and clicked 'yes' on a free application's extra toolbar or two?…
If she represents IE10, then she's not half bad. Maybe quarter-bad at most. At the very least, as good as Firefox. I use all three for work, and she doesn't stall me or anything. Crashes less than Chrome these days, matter of fact.