romancookie11
RomanCookie
romancookie11

So if Matthew Mcconaughey had used a Tesla instead of gravity in Interstellar, would his message had arrived sooner? Probably still not as fast as the speed of Love...

"taking up six or eight or ten times the acreage. It's not even there in more populated places."

No, didn't say it's simple. Then again simplicity is not what we are looking at, it's environmental impact. And every Life Cycle Analysis done on the matter has proven that even considering the processed for battery cell manufacturing, electric vehicles have a smaller environmental impact. No matter the source of the

1)Which shows you missed the point completely. The prius like every hybrid vehicle or EREVs have a very different impact than electric vehicles during the manufacturing process. That is, they have both systems (ICE and battery-centric electric systems). That is, they have the entire manufacturing processes needed to

No educated person would say what you just did in the first place.

Yes, you have the option to select whatever music you want to save on your device for offline use. It will also automatically download the songs you play the most, to decrease data use.

lol

Must be missing all those "nice" supermarkets. Been in Europe 19 years, still have to see one. Then again, it's also hard to find a parking spot...

I had to change pants after reading your response. Standing ovation Sir!

"a lot more smoothly than NASA's ever been capable of."

But...but...mine has never crashed since I bought it. Unlike my iPod touch, which I only use as my car music source and is still able to crash at least once a week. But yea you got it all right, way to go sir!!

The space shuttle provided a multi-purpose vehicle that fulfilled certain needs at the time. The cost factor started to become a problem with higher than expected maintenance costs. Reason why a completely different design approach is used today (only reusable capsule for example).

"Those poor souls".

No, I guess the developers know the difference between a slip of the tongue and the lack of any kind of proofreading. Oh well, they are obviously biased.

The fact that you ask me means you didn't even spend time typing a query in google but spent the time writing the question here on Gizmodo. Impressive.

There is no need to take it with a grain of salt. Just do the research. Unlike your opinion, a scientific study (and less so also a statistical analysis) has no bias. It's called data. The if someone decides to ignore it that's their problem. Data can be a representation of facts, while an opinion (based on no data)

Fox higher ratings have already been explained by studies/surveys showing greater news consumption via the internet (blogs, news websites and news aggregation sites) by politically liberal individuals. This kind of info was also backed up by availability of high speed internet and such and areas that are politically

Necessary? Of course not! I think we should apply what you just said: let's delte the budget for research of the NIH, Darpa, the DOD, the Pentagon (I mean seriously, do we need to develop MORE tech for the military? What a waste!). NASA of course needs to be completely shut down (since research and exploration is what

aec007

I'd point you to politifact, but I feel like you would just brush it away as factual "nonsense". Oh wait, I just did...