1. He was found innocent. Multiple times. Because Emma and her friends kept bringing bullshit charges.

It’s not that much of an overreach once you find out the reason why she is going after Picasso is not because who he is as a person but because she finds the cubist movement as exploitative toward women. She goes after the biggest name of the movement for an absurd reason that any first year art student would just…

Mute chat and voice. Pretend the rest are CPUs. Do it in all modes except Competitive. You’ll have a much better time. I know I do.

I’d love to take this advice. I’d love to play Overwatch. But the unending stream of toxic bullshit that I keep hearing about and seeing has completely turned me off to ever giving the game a try. I don’t need that kind of negativity in my life.

No.

I’m cool with what you’re saying.

Wagner was a favorite of Hitler (and possibly horrible himself)

I looked for other articles on this. She’s going after him not because of his history but because of his art style. From the article;

And THEN there was the porn video she put out once the media coverage had started to wane, allegedly depicting what she alleges happened to her.

Yes, and those complaints were all filed within days of each other after they “heard of each others experiences”. Crazy that they didn’t seem to consider these reportable offenses until then. The first complaint was related to “emotional abuse” from a former girlfriend and the fact that he had not explicitly asked for…

They actually did. They found him “not responsible” which is the “not guilty” of campus rape proceedings. She lied, multiple times to both Columbia and the media and was never made to account for it.

She was found to have lied about numerous things related to her claim.

Forget helicopter parenting. Thanks to her background, she would know exactly what is manipulation, how to spot it and how to use it. With this knowledge, her “pieces” make so much more sense. They aren’t performance pieces as much as manipulation pieces. Such as going after Picasso knowing full well that the press…

despite how she lied about the rape that made her famous in the first, but yeah she’s a great a great artist!

Picasso? I’m gonna say it, that’s reaching. This is a guy who painted through the turn of the century creating the basis for so much of art history (and I get it, not everyone or everything historical is inherently respectable—I am not against uprooting ugly narratives and making new history). But if there was ever a…

Maybe your son would be more comfortable with the “How to Eat Ass” post.

Unfortunately, dictionaries are required to respond to changes how a word is used, now matter how stupidly and incorrectly. That doesn’t necessarily justify using it stupidly or incorrectly. It just means the stupid, incorrect people have won. See also: ironically.

When Mad TV did a skit about the word “literally” in 2001 I thought the issue would die or at least the comical aspect of it.

My bar outlaws condescending douches who start sentences with the pendantic “Actually...”

But you see the issue, right? We have many, many words that are intensifiers already. We have very few that mean “actually happened in a specific and literal sense.” So we’re just losing a tool from our toolkit the way we’ve lost “ironic,” and that’s sad.