Who exactly would have voted Democrat, until they saw the Donald Trump Jr was subpoenaed for perjury by a Republican committee? 

If trying to stop him and not doing anything to stop him are likely to have similar outcomes, why not try to stop him? Even if it’s only to have something to actually do instead of just watching the fire  

Never underestimate a scammer’s belief that they are smarter than literally everyone else

Again, my issue isn’t humanity’s propensity to categorize things, it’s the tendency to let those categories steamroll actual humans who haven’t done anything wrong. I get where the difference seems semantic,

I believe the concept of sexual dimorphism is a way humans contextualize and categorize common differences between individuals of the same species, but ultimately that’s still a social construct that we’re applying to nature in an effort to explain the collection of data points we commonly see grouped together what we…

Wow, so you don’t need to support your own argument and I’m too ignorant to even reply to (as you cover in your long reply...). That’s so convenient for you. I’m glad you’ve built that world for yourself, please go live in it

The rules of any sport are fundamentally arbitrary, which is completely acceptable within sports and not the issue to me, until you realize that they changed the rules in response to a single person who was able to win within the rules already established.

If your only argument is that someone who disagrees with what you already believe is insane or absurd, do you really have an argument? If your mind was blown by an internet comment, maybe it was too small to begin with?

Condescend all you want, I’m just trying to engage.

This entire situation is about discrimination hiding behind a veneer of science. Male/Female are constructs we have created as a society, applying scientific pretense to biological differences as a way to reinforce those constructs has the same logical underpinnings as racial phrenology

Relevant to sport Michael Phelps is biologically different from many of the athletes he competes against in ways that give him clear advantages, but no one seemed interested in rule changes to regulate lung or hand size in swimming.

I don’t see a problem because, again, XY and Womanhood are not mutually exclusive

It’s only an important detail for people who think XY and Womanhood are mutually exclusive. For the rest of us, living in 2019, they are not

She was the child of a career politician and has been a prop her whole life, she got a cushy internship at SNL they discuss earlier in the interview likely due to his connections, and now she’s on TV to parrot conservative talking points and act aggrieved.

Joe Biden is running a campaign built for 1996, where promoting conservative values with a D next to your name lets you secure the middle for a victory while the wing of your party falls in line.

Is “She is Kit Harrington’s equal as an actor” fair? Because I’m definitely trashing their acting here

You do, you just did’t know that’s the name of the movie that style of baddie came from. Basically any vamp that’s less Cullen and more Voldemort

When I was in college I volunteered at a local no-kill shelter, that was really some old hippies running a non-profit on their run down farm. They took all animals, and had two ostriches and 4-5 emu.

Dear Lucille,

This show is self-assured and it’s characters and plots seem organic yet unpredictable, but the action is definitely an afterthought. So it’s basically a photo-negative of The Dragon Prince