Ultimately, that’s for the owners to deal with because those are the choices the owners made. Bargaining for a living wage isn’t raiding a treasure chest (though assuming large quantities of debt without a clear plan to pay it back is another story)
Roland Tembo
rolandtemb0
Pfft, I’m over here working out the Mario timeline. I’m still working out the kinks, but my working theory is that the series mostly takes place prior to the KT Extinction and Mushroom kingdom were basically the Shoggoths from Lovecraft
Boise, woudst thou like to live...deliciously?
That’s the only way the NFL knows how to respond to controversy!
I don’t believe that I said any of that, but please feel free to read back on what I wrote to make sure.
The whole point of what, exactly? I am saying that your interpretation of the article yesterday is flawed, and because of that you seem to be implying hypocrisy on the part of the writer. I believe that the viewpoints between yesterday’s article and today’s are consistent.
The victim isn’t talking to the media, there’s nothing to believe or disbelieve besides anonymous quotes from people with a financial stake in the issue. That’s the thesis of that article, in the absence of reliable and direct information the media is reporting more dubious sources to fill the vacuum
You’re misquoting two sentences as a single sentence, and taking it completely out of context. The assumption isn’t that the accuser is telling the truth, it’s that there’s nothing to go on beside information coming from the team’s media operation. Here’s the paragraph, bolding is mine
I don’t get why pizza is so popular, if you don’t like cheese or tomato sauce it’s just flatbread with random toppings. I guess both of us will just have to live with our respective mysteries
It’s like finance people that are really into Gordon Gecko from Wall Street. Or people who throw Great Gatsby theme parties. Or dance to Outkast’s Hey Ya! at weddings
That tweet is a direct quote from the President, for my money he actually said “United Sates”
University of Chicago is a good school (Obama taught there), so I’m going to imagine that if it wasn’t covered it’s because someone thought it was understood.
Oh good, we can finally admit this show was well acted and well produced but ultimately had nothing to say?
Is Beam where one could watch the Gorilla Channel?
Fortunately, Sweet Tart ran on a strong anti-corruption platform. It probably made more of a difference to voters than the “I Will Let You Pet Me Until I Decide That’s Enough And Try To Bite You” slogan the consultants recommended
It’s because she stole their carrot. There are a lot of people who genuinely believed the Republicans when they said the private market could provide these things better and cheaper that the gov, and now that that’s shown to be nakedly false they’re going to have to look elsewhere to find it
Just because there is outside pressure to make money at the expense of other people doesn’t remove the fact that a choice is made to participate. Executioners pick their line of work and their hands to the killing, diffusing that responsibility onto other people or systems is just delusion
Every attempt at Utopia has always ended in Dystopia...
...she grew frustrated by the restrictions she placed on the company