The victim isn’t talking to the media, there’s nothing to believe or disbelieve besides anonymous quotes from people with a financial stake in the issue. That’s the thesis of that article, in the absence of reliable and direct information the media is reporting more dubious sources to fill the vacuum
Roland Tembo
rolandtemb0
You’re misquoting two sentences as a single sentence, and taking it completely out of context. The assumption isn’t that the accuser is telling the truth, it’s that there’s nothing to go on beside information coming from the team’s media operation. Here’s the paragraph, bolding is mine
I don’t get why pizza is so popular, if you don’t like cheese or tomato sauce it’s just flatbread with random toppings. I guess both of us will just have to live with our respective mysteries
It’s like finance people that are really into Gordon Gecko from Wall Street. Or people who throw Great Gatsby theme parties. Or dance to Outkast’s Hey Ya! at weddings
They have a decent idea/model but they tried to circumvent the founder’s dilemma by making a huge splash. Problem was they alienated people who thought “this is too good to be true.” The people (that I know, at least) they ended up attracting are big movie-goers who were looking for a subsidy for as long as they…
Here’s my tinfoil hat baseless theory on that: if you follow/an algorithm decided you follow far-right media, looking at the internet that day would show a solid wall of support for firing Gunn/boycotting GotG 3. It could be that the decision-makers are in a bit of a bubble themselves
They can take as long as they need, I’ll be happy as long as we get more teenagers hooking up with their stalkers in alcoholic journalists’ spare bedrooms and edgy punk stereotypes hanging out around fire barrels in the abandoned graffiti factory
After Netflix turned in their lower than expected numbers following the same strategy and that townhall leak played out so poorly in the press, Stankey has been talking more about the increased budgets rather than the strategy behind how they’ll be spent. It’s probably the same, but the very rapid change in tone is a…
That tweet is a direct quote from the President, for my money he actually said “United Sates”
Netflix makes money on subscriptions. They need to inspire everyone who doesn’t have an account to join and everyone who has an account to stay. If they continue to accumulate quantity over quality, they become a bloated expense that people are comfortable cutting once they see a better alternative.
They’re essentially paying millions of dollars to become an overcrowded wasteland of B or C-movies customers only watch because it’s there and the stuff they actually want to watch isn’t. Basically,: what Blockbuster was before everyone jumped over to Netflix
University of Chicago is a good school (Obama taught there), so I’m going to imagine that if it wasn’t covered it’s because someone thought it was understood.
Oh good, we can finally admit this show was well acted and well produced but ultimately had nothing to say?
Is Beam where one could watch the Gorilla Channel?
Fortunately, Sweet Tart ran on a strong anti-corruption platform. It probably made more of a difference to voters than the “I Will Let You Pet Me Until I Decide That’s Enough And Try To Bite You” slogan the consultants recommended
It’s because she stole their carrot. There are a lot of people who genuinely believed the Republicans when they said the private market could provide these things better and cheaper that the gov, and now that that’s shown to be nakedly false they’re going to have to look elsewhere to find it
Just because there is outside pressure to make money at the expense of other people doesn’t remove the fact that a choice is made to participate. Executioners pick their line of work and their hands to the killing, diffusing that responsibility onto other people or systems is just delusion
Every attempt at Utopia has always ended in Dystopia...
...she grew frustrated by the restrictions she placed on the company