https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

I would call the VP or senior manager in charge of ad purchases from IBM and ask:
“Up to what frequency would you be OK with IBM advertising being posted next to neo-nazi or anti-semetic content.”

The complaint even admits that it’s true. It says, “Followed specific accounts and then refreshed the timeline until they got a rare instance of ads on those accounts.” Yeah buddy that’s how it works. Thanks for admitting it, that’ll save MM a bunch of money on lawyers. 

This sums the lawsuit up perfectly.
From Dave Karpf @davekarpf.bsky.social
https://bsky.app/profile/davekarpf.bsky.social/post/3kehqr2g2bk22

It’s widely considered nonstandard. In time it will probably become the accepted usage but today, at least in more literate circles, it comes off as a mistake.

Since when do EVs have insane maintenance costs? I just got the 20k service done on my Polestar and you know what they did? Replace the wiper blades and filled the washer fluid. It cost $0. 

That’s a misuse. Words are a contract. Don’t go all descriptivist on me.

Hey Kev, disinterested means impartial. It does not mean uninterested.

FFS.

Great example of a false choice. Both together are almost certainly better than either one alone.

The only thing I can think of for WotC being in the right here is if they knew the cards were first stolen before being sold to the youtuber, but then a legitimate police officer would have to be the one coming to his house with a warrant to reclaim the property.

The fact they sent hired thugs to his house to…

Look, I’m forward-thinking - I accept that people like her didn’t choose to celebrate christmas, and that they were just born that way. What I don’t understand is why they just have to be so flamboyant about it. Like, can’t you do your christmas stuff behind closed doors, and not throw it in all of our faces? I’m…

76% of voters in her district responding with, “Okay, little buddy. You want a nice cup of herbal tea to settle you down there?”

Not because of AOC - blame the DCCC. 

If it only negatively impacts the “value” of speculative collectors’ collections I don’t think I see the problem.

They really aren’t.

Far be it from me to correct some random dumbass with childish views on journamalism, but Jody did all the verification required:

My point remains, you’re complaining about a new vector of attack on homes that is less efficient then every other vector that already exists. It doesn’t make burglary easier because old fashioned lock picking is easier and faster and still effective against this type of lock.

This is such a stupid boomer argument, a window and a rock is far faster, more reliable and, requires no skill to accomplish.

Picking the average home lock can be done in less than 1 minute and can be learned/taught in less than a week. Even if this is exploitable, it’d take longer to boot up a device and activate the exploit than it would be to do it the old fashioned way. Let alone the technical knowledge it would require to do so is more…

You wrote all of this over a silly tweet, on a platform 10% of the US uses (at best), and somehow they’re the ones trying too hard?