The best way to tell if you are a hypocrite is if your voter registration is marked “Republican”.

“Cyberpunk goes out of its way to make its “protagonist” nearly impossible to identify with.”

So are you going to sit there and pretend 2020 didn’t happen?

The same people who’re complaining about bugs and broken game, are also the exact same people who whined and whined about release date delays.

Orange Man said Fauci bad, so Orange Man Kool Aid Club has to hate on him.

It’s truly despicable that people are sending Liana seizure-triggering material in retaliation for bringing attention to this issue out of nothing but concern for others’ wellbeing. 😬

And try building a 7 mile tunnel in the US for a cost that does not include the word “billion”. $160 million for this is ungodly cheap for this type of work. Denmark’s infrastructure is so, so good, and doubly so if you are on feet or a bike, and about 100X better than the US for pedestrians. But, you know, socialism.

Or... they have a relatively wealthy government that actually has an interest in helping the population and improving their quality of life. I suppose that does feel like a foreign concept these days...

Honestly most of the hype I see about this game is people like you, and Kotaku, saying THERE’S TOO MUCH HYPE and almost... hoping for it to fail for some reason? I spend a hell of a lot of my time online (just not on twitter or reddit) and yeah, it’s had a constant hum about it for the past few months since it’s…

As a former journalist who also went to j-school: nope. The story is not his name, the story is his announcement.

You’re not convinced that people are hyped? It must be hard being so thick-headed.

You absolutely can.

I didn’t like witcher 3. to me it was a dragon age inquisition clone but worse in almost every way.

While you don’t need to FEEL the hype, it’s absurd to make a claim that you don’t get it. Let’s look at a few of the things.

He killed two unarmed white ppl. Why don’t you care about white on white violence?

Not a review (it's literally tagged 'editorial' at the top) and this is not a site (not just Kotaku, but Gizmodo as a whole) that is apolitical, because nothing is. For someone boasting about their age, that post is incredibly infantile.

This wasn’t a review, and the shit that Reagan did during his administration was abominable, and that’s just how he dealt with the AIDS crisis alone. Beyond that, his bass-ackwards economic polices, proven not to work and since been deemed a failure by the fucking architect of the policy are still somehow considered…

If your goal here is to prove yourself one of the single stupidest commenters anywhere on Kinja, congrats - you’re definitely in the running.

Three times you admit you don’t know the details and yet three times you offer an opinion? Interesting.

There is a whole world of difference between “a lifetime in the gulag” and “maybe this isn’t someone who should hold elected office.”