At least you acknowledge that they are deplorable.

This has got to be peak Americana, where being actively against minor public health care requirements and ridiculing minorities is just “political views”. Those two words are doing a whole lot of heavy lifting in your argument, friend.

He killed two unarmed white ppl. Why don’t you care about white on white violence?

Not a review (it's literally tagged 'editorial' at the top) and this is not a site (not just Kotaku, but Gizmodo as a whole) that is apolitical, because nothing is. For someone boasting about their age, that post is incredibly infantile.

This wasn’t a review, and the shit that Reagan did during his administration was abominable, and that’s just how he dealt with the AIDS crisis alone. Beyond that, his bass-ackwards economic polices, proven not to work and since been deemed a failure by the fucking architect of the policy are still somehow considered…

If your goal here is to prove yourself one of the single stupidest commenters anywhere on Kinja, congrats - you’re definitely in the running.

In order to minimize perpetual damage to physical, developmental, and emotional health, to livelihoods, and to economies, we need an overwhelming majority of society to become immune so that it becomes exceedingly difficult for the virus to be able spread — i.e., “herd immunity”. It is much more humane, compassionate,…

we seem to be living in two different realities and neither side wants to hear from the other

That feeling when you’re trying to overlook someone’s faults and they keep insisting you don’t deserve basic human dignity...

Quick, go back and look up “impeachment” and come back to let us know if you want to stand by your original comment.  We’ll wait.

Three times you admit you don’t know the details and yet three times you offer an opinion? Interesting.

There is a whole world of difference between “a lifetime in the gulag” and “maybe this isn’t someone who should hold elected office.”

Why should Snowden be willing to serve 3 years in prison? You think people should have to spend 3 years (at least!) in prison for doing something that is a “public service” (your words)?  Maybe it’s just me, but my take has always been that people who do something I consider a “public service” should not actually face…

“becoming a shill for Putin” seems pretty harsh.  What is that based on? 

How is it misleading if one common and recognized use of the word “refute” is “to deny”? If someone reads this article and thinks that Whedon’s lawyers’ statements disprove Fisher’s allegations, it will be because they are irreparably stupid, not because Charles used a word correctly, in a context in which his usage…

Careful not to cut yourself on that edge.

Hey, you’re the one excited to make sure vulnerable people die – and you seem to (conveniently) forget the part where the vulnerable people are already dead in the Sweden story. Flipping the narrative only works when there’s a legit other side, not manufactured drivel.

It's also quite American to not die of food borne pathogens.

If 7 out of 10 people get sick from X, the other 3 people aren't proof that getting sick doesn't occur....