Just like Fort Condor, Bike Chase, Snowboarding, etc from the original FF7?

This is just another Kotaku journalist writing a “negativity piece” about something extremely popular just to get controversy traffic. None of these points hold any merit. 

Still a weird complaint

These are videogames. The point of this medium is not to efficiently get thru a plot, it’s to interact and play with things.

Midgar in FF7 OG was not four hours long during any kind of a casual playthrough.

This is a pretty silly take. No one complains that a novelization has more content than a film. The difference here is its really only as long as you choose to make it.

This. FF7 was the first game I put over 100 hours in getting everything before finishing. I remember golden Choco breeding taking a massive amount of time  and probably have a couple hours alone in watching Bahamut Zero’s animation

I’m glad Claire drew the review straw for this one. Yeesh.

“never meant to be this long”?
I spent about countless hours in the original FF, doing all kinds of quests, grinding to lvl 99 before the final confrontation, trying to get every Materia possible, golden Chocobo breeding... the list was endless.
How can a remake be “too long”?
I mean - it is FF7, most people who buy…

Total income for 2023 was something like $73k, but she wasn’t making $35/hr until more recently. 2024's going to be a lot higher, which is probably part of why she thinks she can afford two Jaguars.

Probably true; I’ll add that most nurses are compensated hourly and paid biweekly — so when salaries are negotiated its typically re: that hourly rate, which is then easier to extrapolate into a weekly/biweekly/monthly income vs an annual salary.

“Hannah, however, was created in a lab to make people very angry online,”

Yeah... don’t forget people like Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolás Maduro... with their combined efforts, ruined Venezuela. 

Technically, a car can completely and wildly *exceed* US standards - and still not meet the letter of the US FMVSS law. For example if it has MUCH better headlights that are not allowed in the US, or at the wrong height, or does not have our required side marker reflectors (but does have side marker *lights*) and on…

The automakers self-certify. What that means is that they design a vehicle to meet the standards, and then have a third party tester crash the vehicle and state that the results met the standards. Then the automaker slaps a compliance label on it (driver’s door jamb), and by that the vehicle is certified. As stated…

It has a Porsche V8 and was designed by Michael Vernon Robinson. The build quality is probably pretty good when you actually look at who worked on it.

While it is absolutely possible they’re lying about the test results, they have to follow the FMVSS crash test procedures as a part of federal law. Those results have to be submitted to NHTSA for them to sell the vehicles to the public.

Except CyberTruck isn’t that heavy.  It’s been internally crash tested.

Yes, that’s what I said. Tesla did the test, filed the results, and NHTSA is declining to do an independent re-test for now. The clickbaity headline implies that the CT hasn’t been crash tested by anyone at all, which the video in the article itself shows isn’t true.

It might be possible to see the test results by…

You have to certify to meet minimal federal crash standards (which is what Tesla’s internal tests are for). But this has nothing to do with the NHTSA star test. That test is only done on the most popular models and is optional, because they don’t have the testing capacity to test all car models.

Some key info here: The Cybertruck *was* crash-tested. It had to be, to get licensed for sale by the NHTSA. The results of that test were filed with NHTSA so that Tesla could legally affix the sticker to each CyberTruck that says it conforms to the FMVSS (49 CFR Part 567).

What NHTSA does is *independently* re-tests…