robb969
Robbzilla
robb969

Obligatory addenum for Nikon lenses:

If you have one of the newer, less expensive cameras from Nikon (Anything newer than the D90 series) you’ll need to pay attention when buying a lens. Stick with the AF-S and AF-I series if you want to be able to auto-focus. These lenses contain a focus motor, something that’s

I have an Android phone and an iPhone (thanks work). The iPhone is the biggest piece of shit I’ve ever used, hands down.

That being said, enjoy using a substandard phone. That’s your right. :D

Practically magic!

Edit: Verified on my work iPhone 7. My co-worker’s Windows phone even works better... and that’s saying a lot. (Actually, his phone is a solid phone, even if it’s not my taste) My Android phone is also right.

or is it? We’re probably ALL doing math wrong, and 1+2+3 actually IS 24. :D

It’s worth it to buy the Star Wars Monopoly, just so you can have the house rule of “I’m ALWAYS Boba Fett.” :)

It’s worth it to buy the Star Wars Monopoly, just so you can have the house rule of “I’m ALWAYS Boba Fett.” :)

Knowing when you do and do not have right of way... as well as actually giving right of way when you don’t have it.

Big one: Yielding to people coming off of the highway’s off ramp. They can’t see you as well as you can see them, and it’s really dangerous to keep moving. They have the right of way. You don’t. At least

If it comes out with Porsche quality, then the wait was worth it. If Tesla is still making rattle-traps that have Kia level fit & finish, then the point is perfectly made.

This reminds me of the VW Jetta Diesel I owned back in the day... (TDI for the pure-minded)

The engine was rock-solid. The trim? Not so much. And don’t get me started on the turbo, the A/C, and the suspension...

Your first link doesn’t mention Lott. Not at all. I opened the PDF for the entire journal and it didn’t mention Lott. The only Lott that came up was Charlotte.

And also the country with virtually no gun ownership.

Totally puts lie to your bullshit... I can see why you’d hate that example. It shows that you don’t need access to a gun to kill yourself. It’s a convenient excuse for people who don’t have the brains to think the issue through... But its just a red herring.

Other

You keep posting bullshit hit pieces from far left sources. You’re the king of confirmation bias today skippy. Grow up and stop getting your news from the left wing’s Alex Jones. You’re pathetic.

Tell that to the Suicide leaders of the world, Japan. No guns, #1 suicide rate.

You’re not too smart, are you? You’re just an emotive ball of crap who believes what he/she believes because it fits your stunted world view, and facts be damned.

Well, he probably paid in to the system, so it would be stupid to pass on the benefits.

Wanting to change the system isn’t the same as killing yourself because the only option is a government one. You’re coming to a pretty stupid conclusion here.

“Oh look... government has a monopoly on air... that libertarian is a

Suuuure he is. This is tripe. Plain and simple. You’re buying into serious confirmation bias. It’s getting pathetic.

Gonna rant about the gay frogs next? Try and sell me some Super Male Vitality vitamins? LOL!


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/think-progress/

Oh look... a far left rag trying to discredit a study they don’t like. Wow. You going to quote Infowars to support a far right thing you support next? You might as well.

By the way, Lott started his study trying to support the idea that gun control was a great idea. he

Really? So Japan doesn’t exist? You know a country with nearly zero access to guns and a suicide rate 50% higher than the US?

Seriously dumb kid... stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

Lott’s research hasn’t been debunked. Nice try dumb kid. Just because you hate what he says doesn’t invalidate his work. And yes, I’ve read the hit pieces on his study, and they’re full of hot air.

But hey! Keep trying to get women killed! You rock!

On the other hand, you might have saved that kid’s life. It was the right thing to do, and you were there to do it. I completely understand what your thought process was, but consider what you would have gone through if you had let that poor guy get killed when you could have saved him.

I don’t say this to berate you.

Fair enough... But then there are shotguns. You don’t have to be a great shot for those... Of course they’re also kinda hard to conceal.

No, you’re not.

Well, maybe YOU are because you’re an idiot. Most normal people aren’t. You’re badly representing a poorly researched paper from a rabid anti-gun idiot who fudged his numbers and cherry picked his stats.

Good job!

You don’t have to retaliate at all most of the time. Simply brandishing a gun is an effective deterrent. Far more than just about any other deterrent this side of having a squad of cops standing behind you. (And of course, they’re armed so...)