I hate how short in the torso women’s shirts are. I have a long torso and huge boobs so it’s really hard to find a shirt that covers my midriff while not being a tent. But I can’t do men’s shirts either because they really weird in the area between my neck and boobs.
roadrunner
roadrunner9
Do they like that? Because I know that I fucking hate that all the adult women’s t-shirts I can find are overly fitted, have annoying cap sleeves that barely cover my shoulder joints, and are often way too short in the torso. Oh, and the fabric is thin and shoddy. (That’s why I mostly buy men’s t-shirts.)
I’m not particularly attractive, but I “get away with” not wearing makeup by not giving a flying fuck.
Who still buys bugs on the train? Bug shopping is why the internet was invented
It just seems really unfair that the rules are so one sided.
Western woman are expected to maintain “modesty” by wearing bras and shirts, even though the men around them are free to go topless. It’s not just Islam that has one-sided modesty rules.
Yep. This is why we old broads keep harping at the Youngs to keep history in perspective & not rest on any imaginary laurels because “we already have feminism and equal rights, it’s over”..... This kind of shit was happening while we were teenagers, young adults, college students. The 80s & 90s were the Backlash…
Honestly, I’m a Bernie supporter who’s going to vote for Hillary, and probably even campaign for her, because, whether the circumstances were fair or not, he lost, and she’s now the only thing standing in the way of protofascist Donald Trump winning the presidency. And allowing Trump to win the presidency would be…
I’m convinced at this point that it is all just “revenge.” After Trump wins they can later say “Well, you didn’t support Bernie and he would have easily beaten Trump, so...happy now?” Because otherwise it just makes zero sense to me.
Michael Dorn as Kilngon Worf on Star Treck?
Maybe I’m missing something, but it’s not like Durant is (was) surrounded by garbage.
I don’t know what it is about this that brings out everyone’s inner labor activist. The two sides of the argument appear to be: KD is A Front-Running Pansy vs. We All Have A Right To Pick Our Jobs And Areas of Residence and that’s a straight up weird dichotomy.
1 million times this. If you can’t understand this sentiment then you & me just don’t watch sports the same way. I respect players who are competitors & shit on guys who aren’t. It’s why we respect guys who carries their teams when shit gets difficult & don’t respect guys who quit when shit gets difficult. People shit…
Totally agree about his motivations. He said in his announcement he wants “a new challenge.” How the fuck is a new challenge going from being a leader of a somewhat-underdog team trying to knock off the big boys (Spurs and Warriors), to being a lesser player on a juggernaut team who doesn’t need you to be able reach…
If KD wanted out of OKC so badly, he didn’t have to sign an extension six years ago. Players should be able to do what they want and I support free agency in all respects, but let’s not act like KD signing with Golden State is first and foremost some noble expression of workers’ rights.
He played for OKC for far longer than he was required to under your indentured servant theory. He was drafted by the Sonics...that’s how long he was on a team you claim he never liked.
“Sports is just a business” and “He accepted a better job offer” are weak arguments predicated on the silly premise all “businesses” are the same, and that the motivations you and I have are even remotely applicable to an NBA athlete. It’s a silly strawman argument.
Russell Westbrook’s life mission in the 2017 season is now to dunk so hard on Kevin Durant that he literally dies.
As far as watching a baseball game in person and seeing extra innings: KEEP THE BOOZE FLOWING. Seriously, cutting off alcohol sales at the 7th inning is a nightmare when you’re entering inning 12, and your buzz is wearing off.