My name was Donald J. GoFuckYourself

It may sound overly optimistic, but I do think it's important to note that the Breitbart/Facebook meme crowd of Trump followers still makes up only a fraction of the total that voted for him in November. A substantial fraction, for sure (maybe half? It's hard to know), but there was a disturbing number of individuals…

If you wanna see real protest, look at any of the TV reviews for Girls or season 1 of The Leftovers. This is tame for AV Club standards.

I stopped watching the season after the election night episode. The seams started coming apart at that point. It was obvious even then.

I think Trey and Matt were even shocked to find out they were right.

Seriously, what the hell? I was looking for an update or something relevant to the current day and see nothing. Oh well, time to revisit the simpler days when he was still somewhat a joke candidate.

Tapper's the Edward Murrow of the cable news era. I don't know what this AV Club dude is smoking.

We all know that KILLARY was no different than him! Muslim ban, Mexico wall, appointing Steve Bannon to the National Security Council. That was all in her platform!

I said the moment the first one came out and bombed that, if some studio were ever crazy enough to let me direct a film, a Purge sequel would be at the top of my priority list. There's so much possibility in such a silly premise.

You're gonna scare him off with big words like temerity. We liberals need to reach out to conservatives and that starts with dumbing down our vocabulary to a fifth-grade level.

There aren't enough upvotes in the world for me to give you for that last sentence.

Take Shelter is a bona fide masterpiece and is easily a top five of the decade. Definitely make the plunge.

It's early yet, but Breitbart didn't seem all too happy about his decision to not go after Clinton. As manufacturing and coal mining jobs continue to deteriorate, I'd imagine we'll see something similar, though who knows. Maybe their adoration for him will make them forget why they voted for him in the first place.…

Hmm, yeah, I guess we'll have to part ways at that point. Although I will think about it.

Yeah, there's nothing there I disagree with. The way it riles up the other side is equally confounding to me. Just to get a clear answer: do you think there's some hypothetical line that liberals can cross where we really do hit the point where we're too heavily embracing labels, identities, and tribes? That doesn't…

It may not be hateful, but intentionally calling someone "Bartholomew" instead of "Bart" when they tell you they go by Bart wouldn't be hateful either. It would just be a pretty weird thing to be disrespectful about and I think would show an obvious amount of condescension toward the other person. It shows you don't…

It's just that the conservative media that I read loves to mock the 500 genders/500 sexual orientations thing. Normally I brush it aside and say that's an exaggeration. But it does seem like might be times where liberals take it too far. What would the line be? Is there no line? It's just a question I never hear…

Ah, thanks. That tends to be how these things go.

Nah, I'll pass. Thanks though.

I'm usually not the person taking this side, but is there maybe some legitimacy to the idea that 37 gender pronouns aren't necessary? Does there become a point where we're so obsessed with labels and identity that we stop being helpful? I'm more than willing to take some feedback for this, because I'm very open to…