They should wear logos (just like race car drivers) so we know who bribed them.

The boards I serve on have a conflict of interest policy. I must disclose any benefit I or a family member would receive from any board action, even if it isn’t financial. And I must recuse myself from any votes.  I’ve done it just because of stock that I own.

I don’t think making good games is a valid prerequisite for being an effective storefront.

“Others feel that Red Dead Online is supposed to be the wild west and some danger around other players needs to exist.”

Um . . . it worked?

I watched him play throughout his career. I always thought he was a good player and he seemed like a good person. It was a shame he was relegated to DH status because of his knees.

“I was surprised. He was good, but I never thought he was great.”

What are you getting at?

Neat! *Adds to retirement backlog*

Love how one of the approved comments on here is someone claiming that banning works featuring underage kids is wrong because “it’ll make dating harder for those who look young” and is censorship, though that person has for a long time now been very obsessed with getting porn games depicting children on steam and that…

As Kotaku’s “connoisseur of Japanese smut games” Mike Fahey once put it, “characters fall into the uncomfortably young category, but rest assured they are whatever age they need to be to ensure publisher NIS America doesn’t get arrested.”

It’s interesting to see the amount of friction this store is generating through the community, people are out defending steam as if they had some personal stock that’s being threatened by epic, it’s like they are reasurring themselves more than anything.

They did put out a screenshot of a dialogue tree. It looks... Pretty much exactly like New Vegas’ system?

“And in the new game, you’ll play the white man looking for revenge against those women. Uhhhh...we probably should have laid that out earlier...”

A woman feeling harassed does not equal a woman being harassed. This is why no one takes #metoo seriously anymore.

Drunk people hit on other people every day, in every bar, at every party. If she said no and he got physical or became an asshole, that’s something. If he was groping her, that’s something. But hitting on her when she wasn’t interested? That’s nothing. That’s a guy misreading the room. (And women can do it too. I…

I don’t understand. Truly I don’t. This new woman is saying that a drunk NdGT made a move on her. This is what we are calling misconduct ? Why is this misconduct ?