My first thought was - I wonder if they’re worried she was going to sue bc the road was improperly closed, and this is their way of forestalling and delegitimizing her.

Last night, while wandering the lands in RDR2, I stumbled upon an escaped prisoner who wanted my help. I didn’t trust him, so I lasso’d him and hogtied him. He laid there, obviously upset at my betrayal. But I also sat there thinking, “err...what next?” There was no sidequest update on my screen, nor any new blip on…

wut.

This was the first game in years that I bought full retail price instead of waiting for sales. Rockstar earned my money and goodwill from how great the first one was (probably my favorite game of all time). So far, its been worth every penny. I’m loving this game. No regrets

I don’t think either approach is wrong. Players just need to know what they’re getting into beforehand.

Did you expect it to just magically sync up to your account? It’s got to pull the data from somewhere.

Preach man. Like I said in a comment above - I have completed 33% of the game content and 20% of the story, and all I am thinking is I wish there was more, and I am also dreaming of DLCs, and Red Dead Redemption 3, because I know this last 66% and 80% aren’t gonna be enough - and people complain because it’s too much?

I don’t get the complaints. RDR2 might be one of the best realized open worlds out there but in the end it is still a video game so getting a video game type reward from an NPC seems right.

I am no sure what else could have happened in some of these interactions for them to seem more real.

I can’t, for the life of me, understand how anyone that has actually played this game could make this type of criticism.  

I kinda get what you’re going for, but I don’t think I agree. In a totally realistic game, not every good deed would lead to a reward. Maybe the person you saved doesn’t have anything to give you, maybe they’re just an asshole, maybe they get killed by random marauders before they get back into town. But at the same…

Ok I’m gonna be honest I still don’t know what the issue is. I just started playing the game so maybe I haven’t noticed yet. The example you gave of finding the guy bitten by a snake sounds awesome. You helped the guy and it paid off much later. I think your argument about the NPCs seeming like dolls, it’s weird since…

Gamestop employee here. Legit had a dad trading in his two son’s switches for the fortnite ones. Tried to talk him out of it, but he said it was worth paying a hundred bucks each for the exclusive skins. I'm still confused.

I’ve posted the same train of thought of other pages (I’m sure you could check my history, along with my brain breaking posts about living in this hellscape of USA)…but THIS is the thing that drives me away from WWE.

You’re missing the point: If they were just running a regular show for regular paying civilian fans in Saudi Arabia without government involvement, it would be a non-issue, just as it was a few years ago. Taking the money and doing propaganda for them is the escalation.

$hocking!

I assume Saudi Arabi is paying for Cena to win an 18 on 1 match, just to show how dangerous one man can be.

Much like God of War, this is a title I had no real interest in but the critical reaction has made me sit up and take notice.