As a whole, even though it happens, society frowns on using sex for commerce. And we also as a whole see that sex in exchange for personal advancement to also be unexceptionable.
rickslamu22
rickslamu22
ALL-HALLOWS EVE costumes are in the stores now people! Get yours while there HOT!!!
I need my sister to get it for me for Christmas.
I'm guessing this version was from the movie right? I've never seen it.
The 3rd wave Fems. are trouble, yes. But dude with all your bullshit, you AIN'T doing our side any favors.
Well male or female, cheating on your spouse and sleeping around are ethical issues.
UM....Grandson to French master Thief Anton (I wanna say?) Lupin. Wanted in many countries for larceny both minor and grand. Crew of "Unique individuals" that includes former mob solder/ bodyguard turned hired gun. A master less Samurai and a competitor/love interest/ con artist.
Well ever episode of Lupin is not the same. It might start out with Lupin and the gang start out to steal something but a lot can change during an episode. Plot teaser here would be nice.
Well Thanks for the translation. But Marie Antoinette?!?!?!?!??! W T F ?!?! The gang go back in time? With ZENIGATA no less?!?!? This is just more confusing! (sigh) I need to go to bed....
Well to be clear the story here as i see it is the gaming press and the relation to developers. And that the press will censor discussion on subjects that developers want buried. Like Zoe Quinn. That's what i meant by the "Who Watches the Watchers" aspect.
Jeese Brian! Ya gonna give us the bullet points or ya want us to learn Japanese to read the poster? WHAT'S IT ABOUT!?!?!!
Now playing
NO ONE posted this?!?!?!
Yes, true that vocal minorities on both sides wish pandering only to their small self interest. But again only referring to the Goldberg and Alexander articles, the vibe i got from them was all of dissent, intelligent and foul, was in the wrong. The foul is correct. The intelligent is not.
Just to be clear, i do not believe gamers as a whole are an insignificant minority. And if that's not what your saying than i also believe that "vocal but insignificant minority" could also refer to the side that thinks they are the ONLY guardians or protectors against sexism.
Thanks for the reply. Sorry about the typos.
I'm sorry but i have never believed that. I think that it it more accurate to say that both sides are either misunderstanding the outer either accidentally or on purpose for an agenda, or are so intractable in there positions that they refuse to here the concerns of the other or believe that this my not be about the…
I have no idea how i DP that. Apologies.
As some one with friends that invite him to pow-wows, I can attest that "Ghost Bears" or only a little less dangerous than the real thing!
As some one with friends that invite him to pow-wows, I can attest that "Ghost Bears" or only a little less dangerous than the real thing!
The "not tolerating sexism part" is not at all what i was talking about. I ask you to read my beginning post again. I said nothing of sexism. This was about two sides to a discussion. And that i believe that Goldberg and Alexander want to stifle one side by rendering them as a non group and therefor not consequential.
…