rickslamu22
rickslamu22
rickslamu22

I'm sorry but i have never believed that. I think that it it more accurate to say that both sides are either misunderstanding the outer either accidentally or on purpose for an agenda, or are so intractable in there positions that they refuse to here the concerns of the other or believe that this my not be about the

I have no idea how i DP that. Apologies.

As some one with friends that invite him to pow-wows, I can attest that "Ghost Bears" or only a little less dangerous than the real thing!

As some one with friends that invite him to pow-wows, I can attest that "Ghost Bears" or only a little less dangerous than the real thing!

The "not tolerating sexism part" is not at all what i was talking about. I ask you to read my beginning post again. I said nothing of sexism. This was about two sides to a discussion. And that i believe that Goldberg and Alexander want to stifle one side by rendering them as a non group and therefor not consequential.

That's my opinion. My claim for the record is that i believe that Goldberg and Alexander do not like that people feel that journalism should intrude into peoples lives to get to the truth. It's the mindset of "I am always right and you are always wrong" that "Mister Phantom" here represents is the point.

And yet you have clearly show that you lie and put words in peoples mouth, as i was defending no such thing. You CANNOT let a person disagree with you because a opinion that is not yours must not stand. And that mentality is why you will never win over undecided people. Because of fanaticism and arrogance. Reply all

To an extent, i would agree with you. But further, as told by others in this post, The nature of the relationship with game journalists with developers. And the assumption of an agenda being propagated by the entire gaming journalist media by social group think that people feel make the fans of this media look like

As this issue for myself is the nature of game journalists relationship with game developers, i would ask you something. Do you thing that the two are entirely too close to the point of being in being insestous (so close or intimate as to prevent proper functioning)?

And yet you automatically assume i'm wrong because you disagree with me. THAT mind set is the problem. Witch you are part of.

I'll laugh. For a minuet or so. Then ask why a serious decisions about and issue that goes beyond one (OR it you like TWO) individual women is getting swept under the rug when a legion of people (some of who are not completely rational i will admit) are passionate about the what they see as a culture of incestuous

I must ask. Why on earth did y6ou read those pages if you knew you where going to be attacked?

First of all we should not link this to Ferguson as it is of an entirely different order of magnitude subject. While important as a call to police over site and representation, It ONLY has the slightest link in the "Who Watches the Watchers" aspect. And many people want this to go away by saying that this should not

Please tell me Luke that you are not of the opinion that "ignorance is bliss" on this or for that matter, ANY other subject. People, And to single us out specifically, Americans, have obsessions with to many unimportant things that when something comes along to destroy something we love, we have no idea it happened

"These obtuse shitslingers, these wailing hyper-consumers, these childish internet-arguers — they are not my audience. They don't have to be yours. There is no 'side' to be on, there is no 'debate' to be had."

The shadow of Collusion and the censorship of discussion is nothing to be taken lightly. As an example, yes while not as important, it's as if the ones breaking into the Watergate where in charge of the investigation of Watergate.

There has been so much hate. So many angry words, so many accusations, over...what? Video games? Women in video games? People who write about video games?

THIS! EVERY BIT THIS!!!

I starred you for trying to bring some fun to a "OH SHIT NOT THIS CRAP AGAIN. EVERYONE WILL TURN THIS INTO A SHITSTORM" article.