The document is not fake.

Back in 2015, Donald Trump mocked a disabled reporter at a campaign event.

and your a retard.

The Democratic Party voted for her.

How exactly is Tim Cook “visibly uncomfortable”? I’m fairly good at reading body language, but I have no fucking clue what you’re talking about. What exactly do you see that portrays him as being uncomfortable?

The problem is that you’re holding Gizmodo bloggers to a high level of journalistic integrity. It just doesn’t exist here. These bloggers are bottom of the barrel amateurs, at best.

Not nearly as good as all the liberal tears of the protesters screaming NOT MY PRESIDENT!!!!111 BUT BUT RUSSIA!!!!11111 :D

Keep telling yourself that :)

...and in the process exposed yourself as the dimwitted defenseless individual that you are. :)

So to recap,

Yes, LITERALLY HITLER! Especially since I’m Jewish! LMFAO!!!!!

I prefer “new-right” but sure, I’ll take that too ;)

“Safe space”, “Alt-right”, “Putin puppet”...so basically, your argumentative skills boils down to spewing the trendy buzzwords of the month. Look at you! You’re SO witty! :D

Blah blah blah, there you go again. Keep blabbing away and hope something sticks. ;)

Yes I took the hint...the hint that when morons like you can’t formulate an argument, you revert to the same old “you have no idea! blah blah blah! I’m smarter than you! blah!! CAUSE I SAID SO!!!!1111”. It’s ok, it’s not your fault for falling victim to the inner-city liberal education system.

Oh look! It’s the same old cookie-cutter response I get from liberals when they can’t formulate an argument.

Yea yea, it’s always about selling out to someone when it doesn’t go your way. Sorry buddy, just because it doesn’t go your way doesn’t mean it’s a conspiracy against you. Wikileaks has published both anti-Bush and anti-Clinton documents. So please, stop being a sore loser and get the fuck over it. Face it, YOU LOST!

Didn’t Gizmodo/Gawker also “hack” the election by flagging all anti-Hillary accounts (like mine)?

Over my dead body.

It’s certainly less of a pile of shit than Gizmodo. But hey, you can always go straight to the source (Wikileaks). After all, they do have a 10+ year track record of always being correct.