Looks compelling but does nothing to address the question of 'why?'

And yet here you are.

What is meant is that exactly what the artist pre-visualizes is made in camera without manipulation pre-process and that the image represents a form of reality that is unadulterated with exception to the image itself being exposed.

This director will show all those fools at the academy that laughed at him just how it is done.

One day you'll realize how idiotically vain it is to do so.

Looks really bad.

Hollywood produces keeping an eye on the gross here and may end up bringing back a zombie Reagan for an updated Bedtime for Bonzo.

The problem is that the forms are really nonnegotiable and if one does not sign they are not getting service.

Thus, there is no need to read and be upset by reality.

Spock finger tent as a greeting:

Why not have both names: Texts from Steenkamp to Pistorius

Next up: A new Remake of Picasso's Three Musicians.

As for Rosemary's baby, there is nothing in the original that could have been improved upon.

Winner.

expand

That's wrong.

There is nothing wrong with admission of being uniformed.

How much do you charge Pepsi for advertising here?

Nice to see the laws of physics have been repealed.

I'm over myself.

Chemistry helped.

Agreed.

Process always more important than destination.

Shut the fuck up, Donny.