It would be helpful if you actually included facts. But your “Europe” facts are clearly inaccurate on its face. Just the population figures alone are inaccurate, since the EU has more than 500 million people.
Ha, and looking at how storage size prices go, it’ll probably be a lot more expensive to upgrade battery life built in.
No open innovation doesn’t mean no innovation.
Yes, but that’s part of the point I was making (and I used mohpie cause I don’t use iPhone, but turns out Apple makes one too! Which fits into the integrated look requirement you wanted.
I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Android phones (and iPhones) have come with 128gb of storage for years. And I don’t think it’s even possible to get a phone with 16 GB for two years now.
Because in the context of a $200+billion dollar business, 50 grand is nothing? Probably roughly equivalent to you just picking up an extra pack of detergent while you were at the store this week before you’ve run out, even if it’s 50 cents more than if you picked it up during your costco run next week.
if your bridge was built without following any building regulations, which according to you have nothing to do with structural integrity and safety, I don’t want it either.
nah, Buzz Killington is a noted crazy conservative troll.
That was obviously a joke...based on your convenient usage of the length of 6-8 inches.
So are you saying that any patch of skin on men that can vary between 2 and 6-8 inches can be shown in public with no problems at all?
Well one thing is that I think, generally, boys do wear more clothing than girls already. If you actually had boys wearing spaghetti straps and crop shorts I think you would get complaints and dress codes telling them they can’t do that. I think, in the closest equivalent to tops that show bra straps, there are dress…
It is pretty close to the same thing. All you’re talking about is level of culpability. Basically, gross negligence vs intentional acts.
No, the idea is not that someone is entitled to earnings of another. It’s that if someone causes damage to you or your stuff (and killing you is quite up there) they pay for it.
So if someone burgles your home, the police shouldn’t come and stop them or arrest them, and if you lose your shit it’s your fault for not carrying insurance to cover it?
It’s not really. How do you think your insurance company figures it out? By suing the other insurance company.
The same thing happens in the U.S., people have to buy mandatory insurance (though usually with a limit on payout).
I think that actually happens to replicate most people’s natural reactions anyway. If a random human pops into the road, most people instinctively brake and swerve, and would instinctively swerve towards stationary objects rather than moving or oncoming traffic. Not many people instinctively mow down a gaggle of…