rhoticwahlberg
RhoticWahlberg
rhoticwahlberg

Wait, so order a bready diner sandwich with no mayo and less meat? Plus a nutritionally void salad? Does that come with a side of hemlock? Also, Thai food is super sugary. What you should be getting from takeout is shit you cannot make at home (e.g. Indian, onion rings) or takes forever (e.g. ribs). That is all.

I ought to of shot that QB myself, George. I shouldn’t ought let no stranger force my QB to play on a busted leg, and then die.

I see what you doodied there.

I would say, rather than cutting all those things out, make your own dang latte. Far, far cheaper over a lifetime. Order your sodas in bulk, online. Same with gum. Go to a matinee of Avengers: Give Us Your Cash, Bitch. Don’t deprive yourself, but indulge sensibly. I like wine, but I buy by the case, and I research

Did not botch. That was very lucidly put, like a post in itself. I wish more posters posted replies the way you do (*cough* Magary* cough*), even though I sometimes sharply disagree with your POV, it is appreciated.

Was not expecting the hot take I got: “Uh, we didn’t really follow the gorilla story, so uh, we don’t know who to blame? No one? We don't know?" Sizzling.

I believe you are confusing him with Johnny Manziel, totally honest mistake.

"...you create a society where you only have homosexuals..."

Part of this process is for them to decide (when it involves saving for a vacation versus buying a boat, for instance)…

Indeed, those were odious times, and Churchill and .FDR don’t come in for nearly enough censure on this. But it does not comapre with:

I disagree, respectfully, entirely. Plenty of societies accept murder, but not nearly everyone ends up dead. Indeed, the very motion of what is and is not “murder” has proven highly elastic over the centuries. But in order for you to try to compel me, as a matter of moral urgency, not to murder you, you have to reach

Not exactly, but he did run a horrifyingly anti-semitic campaign nevertheless.

Yeah nope: Hitler was democratically elected, and the war was warmly supported by the German people (in the early years, when it was going well). I applaud this dude's sportsmanship and decency, I guess, but how many decent men did he kill, before and after, in the name of the Third Reich?

That is absolutely not the case, not unless you were a child. The German soldier were gleefully savage towards civilians of all stripes, let alone Jews. I'm sorry, but your Great Grandpa was a cunt.

Everyone, including liberals, worships the same sky God, they just call it something different. If you believe murder is wrong, you believe it for metaphysical reasons, just as a Christian would. The difference is they think they're gonna get a REEward for it, while you're just doing it because.

Co-signed.

Well, I take back (some of) my earlier remarks—that was a much more nuanced and thoughtful take than I was expecting.

I would never claim you are anti-Semitic, though I would say your posts so far fit a fairly standard profile. Not proof, just a hunch. I do not believe that total casualty count in a military conflict determines who was and was not just in said conflict. Otherwise, Germany and Japan were morally superior to the US in

There are two major problems here: the first is that your actual grasp of the situation is tenuous, at best. The second is that you are displaying classic signs of calcified thinking, driven by a concretized emotional response to the misinformation you have read. It is very, very difficult to convince people who have

Ugh, something actually worse than a Brooks column. Subordinate to Obama? This is why she was popular? Man, I would love to be your therapist. Ka-ching.