rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi
rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi
rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi

Movies can be watched on lots of different platforms. There are reasons to have both a physical copy and a digital copy. Video games can only be played on the console they’re made for. Offering physical and digital copies together would have almost no advantage.

Some kind of wires-crossed bit about the games being worked on by a bunch of different Ubisoft studios? (Ubisoft Montreal, Ubisoft Annecy, Ubisoft Sofia, etc.)

I still don’t understand why they haven’t made this a part of VRV yet considering AT&T owns both of them.

The only customers who would care would obviously not buy these games in the first place regardless of how censored they are. I would be absolutely shocked if this was a major factor in regard to anybody intentionally choosing Sony over other companies. The only standards that make sense here are the ESRB ratings, and

What kind of oversight are you expecting it to have? Government oversight would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment. And it’s not their fault if consumers ignore it.

No, you’re right. The idea of her being a human girl was debunked. By Kotaku itself, in fact. They got a statement from someone from Sanrio about it.

So is it live-action or animated?

Yeah, but it’s just random ads and stuff. And occasionally movie trivia questions.

Usually at least a couple times a month. I saw Captain Marvel last week.

Huh. I’ve never seen this anywhere. I had never even heard of it.

Have they banned any other games for being too “addictive”? What makes this one the one to ban specifically?

Yeah, if I somehow saw the message, I’d be a bit confused, then I’d look it up and have a laugh about it. Heck, it might improve my opinion of the company.

“If it’s implemented on an old name, users can revert to that, and if it’s detected on a fresh name, they’re asked to change it to something that doesn’t suck.”

If you read the article, it’s free, and it sounds like something that will probably only be in print at certain events. Assuming it’s publicly available at all, it’ll probably just be on their site.

How do you know most people aren’t going there for a specific thing? And I have probably a couple hundred things on my list. If it takes me a while to decide on something, it’s because there’s so much stuff that I’m interested in, not because there’s nothing good.

I’d never do it to win, but using a cheat engine (or a cheat mod or something for a more recent equivalent) can be fun for messing around if you’ve already beaten a game.

Exclusivity isn’t platform-limited. It can be limited by any kind of factor. If the Epic Games store is the only store selling a digital product, then they have complete control over the price and how that product can be used. That’s obviously exclusivity by any reasonable definition. (That being said, the same thing

Technically the MCU could produce a Hulk movie whenever they wanted. They’d just have to offer Universal first-look rights in regard to distributing it.

Did the person who supposedly went to Infinity War a hundred times actually give any proof?

Nah, the best April Fool’s joke this year has been Gemusetto Machu Picchu.