Why does everything always have to be one extreme or another? I actually think something like 2 or 3 episodes a week would be a good compromise. It would give things a little more time to get attention and allow more of an opportunity for discussion.

Maybe the interface is different on other devices, but I’m always completely baffled by people who say things like this. I don’t have a problem using it at all, and I find new stuff all the time.

“Some of those are good, some are bad, none are really great”

Not to mention that Netflix’s numbers are obviously the worldwide numbers. For all we know, 90% of the audience for one of those shows could be in other countries. And Game of Thrones is still way bigger if you look beyond the literal ratings.

Do any of those have full-on nudity, though, as opposed to just “suggestive” content?

As far as I understand it, Nintendo generally still wants explicit nudity censored, but otherwise allows anything. Sony wants even suggestive images to be censored. And who knows what the heck Steam allows since they’re more inconsistent now than they ever were before announcing that they were supposedly going to…

I’d be willing to give IP holders *perpetual* copyrights in exchange for three things:

Disney’s been more lenient with fan stuff recently than they used to be. I’m pretty sure Lucasfilm explicitly allows noncommercial fan content (they definitely do at least to some extent). And Disney Channel has both had people submit Star vs. the Forces of Evil fan art to air on TV and had an episode of Big Hero 6:…

Eh...agreed, but for ten bucks I might still consider buying it for the novelty.

I haven’t played Quiplash, but Joking Hazard seems like it would have pretty much the exact same issues of getting old after a while (unless you get expansions).

Considering how stupid it looks, I highly doubt that.

The censorship was added with a patch, so it obviously wasn’t the intention of the developers for it to be censored when that scene was originally rendered.

This, 100%. And I’ll never understand why “hatedoms” for certain things exist, either, where people just constantly feel the need to express how much they don’t like something and tear other people down for liking it. Like, it’s not affecting you at all. Just watch/play/etc. something else and let other people have…

“Objectively speaking, that’s a guilty pleasure”

“I love tons of media that I know isn’t ‘good’.”

Just out of curiosity, can you describe in what way Black Panther is “truly good” while Bohemian Rhapsody is “mediocre at best”? I get that it’s subjective, but I’d put Bohemian Rhapsody above it. And if any superhero movie deserved a best picture nomination this year, it was Into the Spider-Verse.

“Something like Spider-Verse would have gotten thumbs down and two stars twenty years ago.”

I wouldn’t be surprised if I was actually better at it as a kid than I would be now. I remember being able to win the whole game in probably twenty-something minutes, but I’m sure if I played it now, I’d probably have a hard time getting through World 8.

Wasn’t there a rumor at some point that it might actually be an anthology series? I could have sworn that I’d seen that somewhere.

84% on RottenTomatoes means that 84% of critics have given it positive reviews. “C” can count as positive or negative depending on the critic (in the AV Club’s case here, it counted as negative). The average *rating* on RottenTomatoes is only 6.93/10, with 6.23/10 from top critics. Sounds like a “C” average (or worse)…