I mean, “basic logic” would allow for the possibility that the distributor could offer multiple versions to Netflix and let them choose which one to license... They could be wrong, but you definitely wouldn’t have to be a “moron” to think that could happen. And in response to some of your other comments, you haven’t…

It’s still possible that the distributor could own the rights to multiple versions. It would amount to essentially the same issue regardless of who’s picking which version gets put up.

That deal is over now.

It’s already been renewed for a second season.

It’s really not that bad of a show. I’ll never understand why hatedoms for things like this exist. Why expend so much energy just getting mad that other people like something that you don’t? (Or in a lot of cases - not necessarily this one specifically - something to which you haven’t even given a chance.)

I don’t mind the fact that people might technically have played different versions of a game or whatever. The real problem with patches is that future players will be unable to play any patched version of the game at all because the servers will inevitably shut down at some point.

Did they ever have that feature in the first place? I could have sworn it was always steaming-only. That was why I never bought anything.

“though any you might have picked up previously will still be available to re-download”

Huh. I thought that “Bayoneta” thing must be the Bayonetta anime movie with a typo, but I guess it’s some random movie about a boxer?

It’s because they’re all owned by other companies that either want to put them on their own streaming services or see Netflix as too much of a competitor to do business with anymore.

There’s already a Five Nights at Freddy’s movie in development, anyway. Some other company has the rights.

when you completely miss the point on purpose

Whoops, I meant the Wii U version. O.o

Agreed. Though it would have still been nice if a full sequel had given you the option of making full-on Super Mario 3D World-like levels as opposed to just having it as a theme while still being 2D.

The 100 Mario Challenge on the Switch version was also similar-ish, but it didn’t have an overworld, and I think the levels were just chosen randomly from a range of clear percentages rather than being in order by the percentage.

If not for the mostly (and unfortunately) diminishing returns of the LEGO movie franchise, I honestly think some kind of LEGO Harry Potter movie would have been the most likely track for a reboot to take if it *was* actually going to happen anytime remotely soon. I mean, they’d have to do something different with it…

Shoutout for Skulduggery Pleasant, the series that more than anything else should have been “the next Harry Potter” in my opinion. Yet despite there being 11 books in the series now, nothing past book 3 had even been released in the US until last year...

“Mostly because these new movies are not building the fan base.”

I always see people say this, but I’d much rather get a new TV series set in the same world than another adaptation of the books. Game of Thrones works partially because most people haven’t read the books. But with Harry Potter, there would be nothing to speculate about. Taking 7 years to go through it - a story that…

I’d be shocked if the next movie they do after the Fantastic Beasts series is over isn’t a Cursed Child adaptation. Assuming they do get through all five movies and that there continue to be 2 years between each, Radcliffe and the other actors will be right around the right age to play their “19 years later” selves at…