rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi
rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi
rhgoiasrhgoihfgoifsdhoi

“though any you might have picked up previously will still be available to re-download”

Huh. I thought that “Bayoneta” thing must be the Bayonetta anime movie with a typo, but I guess it’s some random movie about a boxer?

It’s because they’re all owned by other companies that either want to put them on their own streaming services or see Netflix as too much of a competitor to do business with anymore.

There’s already a Five Nights at Freddy’s movie in development, anyway. Some other company has the rights.

when you completely miss the point on purpose

Whoops, I meant the Wii U version. O.o

Agreed. Though it would have still been nice if a full sequel had given you the option of making full-on Super Mario 3D World-like levels as opposed to just having it as a theme while still being 2D.

The 100 Mario Challenge on the Switch version was also similar-ish, but it didn’t have an overworld, and I think the levels were just chosen randomly from a range of clear percentages rather than being in order by the percentage.

If not for the mostly (and unfortunately) diminishing returns of the LEGO movie franchise, I honestly think some kind of LEGO Harry Potter movie would have been the most likely track for a reboot to take if it *was* actually going to happen anytime remotely soon. I mean, they’d have to do something different with it

Shoutout for Skulduggery Pleasant, the series that more than anything else should have been “the next Harry Potter” in my opinion. Yet despite there being 11 books in the series now, nothing past book 3 had even been released in the US until last year...

“Mostly because these new movies are not building the fan base.”

I always see people say this, but I’d much rather get a new TV series set in the same world than another adaptation of the books. Game of Thrones works partially because most people haven’t read the books. But with Harry Potter, there would be nothing to speculate about. Taking 7 years to go through it - a story that

I’d be shocked if the next movie they do after the Fantastic Beasts series is over isn’t a Cursed Child adaptation. Assuming they do get through all five movies and that there continue to be 2 years between each, Radcliffe and the other actors will be right around the right age to play their “19 years later” selves at

Not sure if you can link to articles from other sites here or not, but look up “Cashing In Karma: How A Former Landscape Architect Turned His Reddit Fame Into A Career.” I doubt most people are doing it for any particular reason, but it is possible to get something out of it. And in regards to the “D-list

Didn’t some events in Maleficent break canon with Sleeping Beauty, though? I don’t remember any specifics, but I’m pretty sure they aren’t compatible with each other.

D+, seriously? I thought it was one of the better episodes in a while.

That comment was only meant to refute the implication that people who want everything to be on Steam or who don’t want Epic to have exclusives are automatically endorsing a monopoly. I get that there are reasons why it might not work out, but I don’t think there’s any question that from a consumer perspective, having

This. All people ever seem to do on the Internet nowadays is call out one group or another as though a few bad apples mean the whole orchard is bad. Political parties, people of particular sex/gender/religion/nationalities, even fandoms. I’d go so far as to say that people’s tendency to generalize diverse groups as

This. And isn’t the very idea of cultural appropriation itself kind of racist? (Or whatever the equivalent word would be here.) After all, it just amounts to saying people can’t do something because of who they were born as.

I wasn’t aware that games exclusive to the Epic store could be priced differently from how they’re priced on the Epic store. Or that the customer service could be different from their own customer service. And so on.