look at his stupid face. 

yeah, unfortunately.

so the logical conclusion of the first part of their argument, that in a “free society” consumers should be allowed to engage with products how they want, would be that the collection of people at steam would be allowed to engage with products however they want. in the case of end use consumers, they can buy or not…

you’ve gotta be trolling, right?

dunno, i think it’s a pretty horrible end (which is what the OP said, not horrible death) to die in a public place and have your body left there for a while with a sheet thrown over it.

yep. these little assholes need to learn the lifelong consequences of saying horrible shit on camera in the age of the internet.

yup.

yeah, the fact that her father didn’t express horror and revulsion at her behavior, and tried to excuse it, says that she learned it from home.

when i was a freshman in college, i lived in a coed dorm. each floor had a bathroom, but the bathrooms were not coed at that time. my floor’s bathroom was for guys.

now i want poutine. thanks. 

i once got stuck in an expensive dress (i had no business trying it on because i was not in the market for a $500 dress) in a dressing room, and the 5 minutes it took me to get it off were the scariest of my life.

a very close friend is a prosecutor for sex crimes in a populous county, and the answer is, well, not necessarily.

when it comes to understanding evidentiary logic, i think people get purposefully obtuse about accepting that witness testimony is, in fact, evidence.

yes! so much fun! 

did someone just make an avocado burner account to argue about avocados? WHAT? weird. 

i read the second part of your comment as “people who own $1 canada goose coins”

WAIT.

hah!

i do that too! i always think of it more fondly than the experience merits.

i was worried nobody was going to get here.