rexryanisnotcool
FredJacksoniscool
rexryanisnotcool

Announcers aid the back judge had blown it dead

Such a lazy joke. Wish I could downvote you. 

Two things: (1) this site is rarely “balanced,” and (2) people that come here come here because of that imbalance.

Book doesn’t sound very balanced, gotta say, if the whole thing is like this. 

totally fair comparison

Let’s see if we can figure out a way to portray him as a victim here!

Your take has no place here. You know, the “obey the laws of society” and “if you don’t, it’s never your fault” stuff is more popular. 

Comment brought to you by another open-minded liberal

He’s not wrong?

Spirit saves you a ton of money when you fly. What’s wrong with that?

You mean airport police? Those were NOT united employees. Didn’t stop the public lynching, however, of them. 

Don’t blame the airlines for lack of innovation on these admittedly very cool concepts around seat designs - FAA certification is a long and arduous process. And airlines need standardized seating configurations across entire fleet types or else it becomes operationally challenging. These are cool concepts but, like

It’s called public intoxication. Maybe seems a bit harsh but Deadspin is a pretty reliable place to come and read blogs that don’t note anything about personal choices and consequences of certain actions. 

Show me one person that blames Carmelo for refusing to give up that money

The one thing I’m fairly sure of... the NFL is litigating its way into sucking, hard, if this shit continues. 

When will the NFL realize they can’t litigate away this problem and that fixing the issue requires practical, out-of-the-box thinking? Like leather helmets, for example. OR... just say fuck it and drop ALL these rules, which actually might even oddly make the game safer if players effectively police themselves. 

Trump makes an overture to a very bad person to try to find some common ground and you just bash him. Literally you hate everything this guy does without even evaluating it on its own merits or in a vacuum.

See, it’s not that there is anything technically inaccurate with your work here, but it’s more that you are gently guiding a narrative that you personally plays out. I’ve seen no reporting of some of the other side of this bizarre situation that raises credibility questions about the accuser. Or her friend, for that

Thanks for the reply. Very thoughtful. 

Makes sense. Thanks!