I wouldn't want a car that can do 184MPH to be a convertible. Seems like you could save weight and go even fast and safer with a full roof.
I wouldn't want a car that can do 184MPH to be a convertible. Seems like you could save weight and go even fast and safer with a full roof.
They want $5 to ship that little helicopter. I'm in for 2, but it comes to $30...no longer a $10 chopper. It's really $15. So not IN!
I like where Ford is going with the Mustang. Seems like it's a bit beyond the Camaro in range of offering, performance, as well as technology. I like the idea of a drag tree in my gauge cluster. Just need to adapt that over to a certain '67 in my garage...I kid!
Looks bad ass. Now let's see the shoot out between the ZL1 Camaro and the GT500.
Also, it should be American made and between the years of 1967 and 1973...but no always. Just the traditional definition...at least to me.
So much overlap in technology.
Upload them to your cloud drive, using your computer. then you'll have them up there, available on the Fire.
"So when the next product is announced, maybe we should all step back and think what we're about to buy. And while you're doing that, I'll be entering my credit card information."
meh.
Daily driver right there!
Damn, number two looks like the better parts of my ex-girl friend...FRISKY!
So what you're really trying to say is that after a hundred years, reporting on the 11/11/11 date still has no real interesting points.
Maybe this will put an end to all those batteries that are future polluters.
Leave the speed on the track. When will people learn?
I hope they put it in reverse and let the car decide if it should go in the drink or not...